Catégories
Vie de l'église

Catholic dioceses, organizations bankroll state anti-abortion initiatives

Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, every state-level campaign to limit abortion has failed. But that hasn’t stopped Catholic organizations from stepping into the fight again this election year.

Catholic organizations are bankrolling campaigns against abortion-rights measures, spending at least $1.5 million so far in five of the 10 states where such measures are on the ballot, according to a joint investigation by National Catholic Reporter and Mother Jones.

In Florida alone, dioceses and bishops have spent more than $1.1 million, and church entities in South Dakota have recently ramped up spending as the election nears. In other states, the church’s hierarchy may be sitting out financially, but wealthy individuals with well-established associations with the Catholic Church, or church-affiliated groups — like local parishes and Knights of Columbus chapters — have stepped into the fray.

The fight in Florida over Amendment 4 — a ballot initiative to add the right to an abortion in the state constitution — has become a political lightning rod, so it may not be surprising that the high-profile battle has attracted heavyweight donors from across the country. Florida requires 60% voter approval to amend the state constitution.

Abortion-rights groups have raised at least $60.7 million, swamping the $9 million raised by anti-abortion groups — both sides flooding the airwaves with ads. The majority of the money pouring in on the abortion-rights side is from major national groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood. Catholics for Choice has contributed just $10,378 to the fight in Florida. (Searches in other states turned up no other donations from Catholics for Choice.)

With the appearance of a showdown between the powers on each side of the national debate, it may be fitting that the Miami Archdiocese has given the most money of any church organization in the country this year — three donations totaling $384,000 to a political action committee called Florida Voters Against Extremism.

The Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops has donated another $271,000 and the Catholic dioceses of Venice, Palm Beach and St. Petersburg all gave $100,000 each. Dioceses in Orlando, St. Augustine and Pensacola also donated. 

Various Florida Catholic dioceses and the state’s bishops’ conference have stepped in, financially, during previous ballot initiative fights, but never on this scale — prior to 2024, they had given just $198,000.

The church in Florida has made these donations, a representative from the bishops’ conference said, because « it would be unconscionable not to defend against this threat to the sanctity of unborn life and the dignity of pregnant no women. »

The money comes from diocesan and individual contributions to the conference’s general operating funds, said Michele Taylor, associate director for communications. « Dioceses and the conference observe Florida election and campaign finance laws and so there have been no special collections for the defeat of Amendment 4, » she said.

Diocesan donations in other states were substantially smaller, but so is the overall size of the ballot initiative fights. In South Dakota, for instance, the Sioux Falls Diocese has donated $340,000 to two separate anti-abortion PACs fighting to block a ballot initiative to create a similar protection for abortion rights in the state constitution.

The one abortion-rights group raising money to support the ballot initiative’s passage had only raised $298,000 in September and October. The Sioux Falls Diocese’s donation included an in-kind donation of $40,000 for polling work. All of the diocese’s donations have been made since Sept. 25.

Similarly, in Colorado, despite a heavily funded abortion-rights PAC filling the airwaves with ads in support of Amendment 79, another effort to install a right to abortion in the state constitution, the Catholic Church had seemed to be uninterested — at least in terms of financial donations — in the fight until very recently.

But on Sept. 11, the Denver Archdiocese sent a $50,000 check to the Pro-Life Colorado Fund, and a second much larger check for $175,000 to the same group on Oct. 22.

In Missouri, by contrast, the St. Louis Archdiocese, four other dioceses around the state, and the state bishops’ conference all donated $5,000, but earlier in this year and only to the effort to block an abortion ballot initiative from ever getting on the ballot. Since the initiative was approved for the ballot, the dioceses haven’t donated again.

Some Missouri pro-life groups had hoped the fight against the constitutional amendment for abortion rights would attract more national money, said Jamie Morris, executive director of the Missouri Catholic Conference, the church’s public policy agency in the state. He believes the focus on the presidential race, and ones in the Senate or House, put the financial focus elsewhere.

Losses in previous amendment battles, as in Ohio and Kansas, also may have dissuaded funders, Morris said. « I do think ours is tighter than Ohio’s ended up, » he said. « It would seem ripe for someone to come in and at least get some messaging and funding out there to push it over the top. »

Polling shows more than half of Missourians favoring the amendment, with 34% opposed. The Ohio abortion-rights measure was approved 57% to 43% in 2023.

In some states, spending from groups or individuals closely associated with the church has dramatically augmented or, arguably, eliminated the need for church spending.

In South Dakota, for example, where diocesan spending has been heavy, the national Knights of Columbus organization, based in New Haven, Connecticut, contributed $200,000 to a group opposing that state’s constitutional amendment on abortion. In Missouri, where the dioceses have spent only $25,000, the state Knights of Columbus chapter has chipped in $75,000.

In Nebraska, two ballot initiatives — one seeking to block abortion rights, the other to add it as a constitutional right — have attracted millions in spending, but none from that state’s dioceses. But two families of prominent Nebraska Catholics have contributed more than $6.6 million of the total $7 million donated to anti-abortion committees in the ballot initiative fight. 

Marlene Ricketts, the wife of TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts, and her son, Sen. Pete Ricketts (R), Nebraska’s junior senator, have contributed $5.1 million. The Ricketts family are prominent Catholics, and Joe Ricketts has given millions to the Catholic Church in Nebraska, including an estimated $34 million on the creation of a Catholic religious retreat.

Two members of another family, the Peeds, who have recently become prominent donors in conservative political and Catholic circles, chipped in another $2 million. Family matriarch Rhonda Peed has said faith drives the family’s charitable giving, including some $1.8 million to the Diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska, in the past two decades.

In Missouri, prominent conservative and anti-abortion attorney John Sauer has contributed roughly $757,000 to the fight over abortion. Sauer, a former solicitor general of Missouri, has represented anti-abortion groups in the past and successfully defended a Catholic priest accused of sexual abuse.

In January, Sauer represented former President Donald Trump in his successful claim before the U.S. Supreme Court claiming broad presidential immunity. Missouri state campaign finance records show that this year Sauer gave $500,000 to Missouri Right to Life, which was spent to oppose an abortion-rights ballot initiative, and $257,000 to a political committee set up specifically to oppose the initiative as well.

Representatives from the Sioux Falls Diocese and the Denver Archdiocese did not respond to interview requests.

In all 10 states, Catholic groups and dioceses are working to oppose abortion-rights amendments with mailings, bishops’ statements, videos, prayers and other resources in English and Spanish. Says Morris of Missouri: « It’s kind of an all-of-the-above approach. »

Yet, the effectiveness of church attempts at persuasion are questionable. A recent poll of Catholic voters in seven battleground states found that the hierarchy’s influence on voters in their flock is extremely limited. Only 32% said bishops were very or somewhat influential in voting decisions, and 37% said priests were, according to the poll, which was conducted by the National Catholic Reporter.

Political strategies, like funding statewide anti-abortion initiatives, is only a part of conservative Catholics’ « long game, » according to Mary Jo McConahay, author of Playing God: American Catholic Bishops and the Far Right (Melville House).

Legal activist Leonard Leo, for example, has turned his attention from the U.S. Supreme Court to a web of Catholic organizations aimed at instilling traditionalist values in the broader culture.

« I think ultraconservative Catholic intellectuals are leaning now in the direction of changing culture itself to achieve their various goals, including demonizing — or criminalizing — abortion, homosexuality, transgender people, etc., which also would move the country closer toward Christian nationalism, » McConahay said. « As long as the majority of the voting population is pro-abortion, Catholic money may start to go to this kind of longer-term effort, rather than fighting ballot measures. »

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The problems and potential of synodality

The management of princes was an essential task of statecraft in earlier, monarchical ages. In our more democratic epoch, the essence of governance or leadership is more often the management of expectations.

Pope Francis’ synod on synodality, which concluded Oct. 26 with the adoption and promulgation of a 51-page final document, has been stalked by an inability to manage expectations from its start. That failure need not be fatal, but it must be addressed soon and often.

The final document sets forth the purpose of this synodal undertaking: « In simple and concise terms, synodality is a path of spiritual renewal and structural reform that enables the Church to be more participatory and missionary, so that it can walk with every man and woman, radiating the light of Christ ». Such a reorientation is the work of a generation or more. It is not a three-year process, but a 30-year one. Our generation must learn how to be synodal and only when we have passed that gift on to another generation will we know if the change has taken root.

You can’t turn a large ship on a dime, and the church is a large ship. But the turn has begun. This is no managerial alteration. « Ecclesial discernment is not an organisational technique but rather a spiritual practice grounded in a living faith, » the document states.

Two core ecclesiological realities permeate this document. First, the council called for and embodied both ressourcement and aggiornamento, a return to the sources and a bringing up to date. Much of the post-conciliar theological debate has been about which of those two objectives take priority.

The answer is confirmed: Ressourcement allows the church to move forward in new ways, but only if those ways emerge from a lived reflection on the early church, especially as witnessed in the Scriptures. It is a dialogical process of renewal in which the needs of our time are viewed through the lens of tradition, and in which the tradition better attunes us to an authentic appreciation of those instances of grace that we call the signs of the times.

Second, that return to the sources opens up a more pluralistic understanding of the church than what was obtained in the pre-Vatican II years. In the early church, the dynamic of pluralism — and of dialogue — was between the churches of the East and the West. Now the dynamic is between the churches of the Global South and the churches of the post-industrialized West. One synod participant told me to reflect on this difference, and another told me the analogy was bosh. Either way, the final text demonstrates that the synodal process can generate a fair amount of consensus, even if certain neuralgic issues are not yet ripe for consensus.

It is unclear whether or not pulling the neuralgic issues off the agenda helped or hurt the development of synodality. In March of this year, the pope announced the creation of 10 study groups to work on particularly challenging topics, including the role of women in the church. One of those groups, group 5, was tasked with studying « some theological and canonical matters regarding specific ministerial forms, » including the possibility of ordaining women to the diaconate.

Maybe the pope had his reasons for removing the topic from the discussion. Maybe he was worried that the issue remains fraught and that searching for a premature consensus could derail the entire synodal process. Maybe he is right. But, couldn’t he have said at the start of the process three years ago: « If we start with some of the most problematic issues, the whole synodal process risks going astray. We must first focus on the evangelizing mission of the church and then, and only then, turn to specific issues. »

Such a statement would have disappointed those who want action and want it now. But at least everyone would know where they stood. Instead, even the Vatican’s effort to dialogue with synod participants on the issue turned into a fiasco.

The themes that have marked this papacy all along are present in the vision sketched by the synod: reaching out to the peripheries, learning from the poor, bringing God’s mercy to a broken world. Anyone who thought Francis’ commitment to the church’s social teachings meant he was going to water down other teachings was wrong to expect that. The coherence of the church’s teachings may not translate into the culture war categories of the U.S. church, but they are coherent nonetheless.

None of this should be permitted to detract from the enormity of what has begun. Now it is time to bring the synodal experience back to the local level. Will priests actually listen more attentively to their pastoral councils? Will the bishops’ conference create a standing committee to help the bishops bring synodality to the local churches, as Cardinals Blase Cupich and Robert McElroy discussed in this interview with my colleague Christopher White? Will bishops solicit the opinions of a more varied group of lay Catholics? Will the laity take its responsibility to better understand the task of ecclesial discernment? Will we, all of us, learn how to set aside our own agendas long enough to listen, like Elijah, to the gentle whisper of the Holy Spirit?

A final thought. I always warn people to remember that a document like this pertains to the whole church, not just the church in the U.S. Our myopia can be overwhelming.

Now, however, Catholics in the U.S. are on the eve of a polarizing election. We have an opportunity to witness to the ambient culture a synodal method that allows us within the church to address and, if not overcome, at least ameliorate our points of divergence. The document cites « disenchantment with the functioning of democracy » and « increasing autocratic and dictatorial tendencies » as among the problems facing the world, problems that will be solved by force or by dialogue.

The church is called to be « a sign and sacrament of the unity of the whole human race » (Lumen gentium) and in this moment, U.S. Catholics are called to see in synodality a means by which all Americans can remind themselves that we are « fellow citizens. » That must be our hope and our challenge.

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Synodality demands transparency and accountability from bishops

From the beginning of his papacy, Pope Francis has waged war against clericalism and called on the clergy to be servants of the people of God. This struggle continued in the synod on synodality, which ended this past weekend.

Synods in the past only involved bishops, but at this synod lay men and women made up about a quarter of the delegates. In addition, the synod began in 2021 with a worldwide consultation process that took stock of the ideas and hopes of ordinary Catholics.

If synodality means that bishops are no longer to be treated like princes whose views are to be followed without question, how does the church change to have more transparency and accountability from bishops? This is a major question asked in the synod hall.

The church already has some consultative structures that could be adapted for use in dioceses for greater transparency and accountability.

On the clerical side, there are the diocesan consultors, a group of priests who advise bishops who head dioceses, as well as a separate priests’ council. On a few issues, such as the closing of a parish, the bishop is required to consult with the priests’ council and diocesan consultors.

Bishops are also required to have a finance council, which can include lay people, whom he must consult on the disposal of church property and other major financial issues.

Other bodies not mandated by canon law but available to bishops are diocesan pastoral councils and synods, which can be consulted on a wide range of issues. Most U.S. dioceses have pastoral councils, but synods are rare.

One question, therefore, is how to make these consultative bodies more effective.

Most agree that the latter bodies should no longer be optional, but there is more to be done than making them mandatory. These bodies would be ineffective if they meet only rarely or are treated as passive, rather than active, participants in the life of the diocese.

These bodies could be very effective if they followed the methodology of the synod on synodality. This would require listening sessions in which their members would hear from parishioners before the consultative councils meet with the bishop.

When they do meet with the bishop, there should be an atmosphere of prayer, with conversations in the Spirit in small groups as occurred at the synod. After the small groups present their findings to the larger body, that larger group would then work toward consensus on the direction the diocese should take.

Topics that come up might include diocesan finances, parish life, formation of priests and lay ministers, Christian formation of laity, the care for the poor and the promotion of justice. Bishops should also present to their councils the diocesan budget and audit.

The councils should be able to question the bishop and chancery officials on these topics and give advice. In future meetings, the bishop and chancery officials should report back on what they did with the recommendations of the council.

The councils would undoubtedly find some topics that need further study, which would require committees to work on these issues between sessions with members of the chancery — a diocese’s administrators and legal minds. Assemblies without committees rarely get anything done.

Simply gathering people together in councils does not automatically guarantee synodality. Bishops must risk transparency, allowing the laity to speak freely, even if it means hearing criticism of their decisions. He also has to make sure that his chancery staff is open to the process.

This is a new way of proceeding in the church, and professional facilitators will be needed to help create and sustain the process. At the synod in Rome, a facilitator at each table guided the process, while not determining outcomes.

Another system of accountability for bishops is the “ad limina Apostolorum” visits — “to the threshold of the Apostles” — that bishops make to Rome every five years. Prior to the visit, the bishop and his staff draw up a quinquennial report on various aspects of diocesan life.

These reports should be done in a synodal fashion, with input from the priests’ council and diocesan pastoral council. Part of the report should reflect the views of the councils and not just the bishop’s. In fact, the two councils should write up an evaluation of the bishop’s job performance to be sent separately to Rome. In extraordinary circumstances, they might even recommend his retirement or replacement.

Synodality, done right, will require a lot of time for the bishop, chancery officials and council members. Oscar Wilde famously said that the problem with socialism is that it would take up too many evenings. The same is true of synodality in the church — it takes commitment and time. But if the goal of synodality is to get the entire church involved in furthering the mission of Jesus, what better way to spend your time?

The alternative is the continuation of clericalism and paternalism in the church.

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Key races could flip the House

When Americans go to the polls, they will not only be selecting a new president. All 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives will be elected next week too. And the margin for control of the lower chamber is likely to be very close.

The Republicans took control of the House in 2022 but only barely, winning 222 seats to the Democrats 213. With such a small margin and such a divided caucus, that gavel turned into a hot potato for Speaker Kevin McCarthy who was ousted by fellow Republicans after only nine months. After three weeks of wrangling, the GOP finally settled on Rep. Mike Johnson as the new speaker. It has been a bumpy year for Johnson, and he has only passed key legislation on a bipartisan basis.

The constitutional requirement of election every two years was supposed to make the House the most responsive to popular opinion, but, as of this writing, according to the Cook Political Report, 365 of the seats are not even competitive and only 26 contests are rated as « toss ups. » Gerrymandering has made the House the least responsive to changes in public attitudes.

In 2022, the Republicans flipped four competitive districts in New York state, providing the margin of victory. New York had undergone a messy redistricting process after the 2020 census, but it yielded more competitive districts. Unfortunately for the Democrats, they were not prepared.

The state Democratic Party claims it has learned its lessons from 2022 and aims to reclaim all four of those seats from the GOP. Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has emerged as a point-person in the effort which, if successful, would make him Speaker of the House. « Jeffries is completely focused on New York because he has to be, » a source told CNN. « He’s been fundraising, doing campaign stops, strategizing, meeting with all the relevant entities, having regular phone calls with the delegation to strategize, connecting them with donors — he is doing it all. » Three of the four seats the GOP flipped two years ago are listed as « toss ups » by Cook Political Report: New York’s 4th, 17th and 19th districts.

Two Democratic incumbents are in toss-up races in the most heavily Catholic part of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Unlike New York, Pennsylvania is also a swing state in the presidential race so those races are highly nationalized whether they want to be or not.

Rep. Matt Cartwright is defending his seat in Pennsylvania’s 8th Congressional District, centered on Scranton. Cartwright has represented it since 2013. He won reelection in 2022 with 51.2% of the vote to GOP challenger Jim Bognet’s 48.8%, but midterms are low turnout events. In 2020, Cartwright won with a slightly larger margin, also against Bognet, 51.8% to 48.2%, but the district has grown increasingly Republican over the past few election cycles according to a report from the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. If Trump wins this district it will be hard for Cartwright to hang on.

The same holds for Rep. Susan Wild, who represents the 7th District, just south of the 8th District. It is anchored on Allentown and the Lehigh Valley. Allentown is now a majority-minority city, with 54% of the citizens identifying as Latino. Trump and the GOP are making inroads with working-class Latinos in the area, which has generally been trending Republican since 2008.

Arizona is another swing state in the presidential contest that is home to two toss-up districts, both currently held by Republicans. In the 1st District GOP incumbent Rep. David Schweikert narrowly held the suburban Phoenix seat for two years against a relatively unknown and underfunded challenger. National Democrats are pouring money into the campaign of state Rep. Amish Shah.

Arizona’s 6th District pits incumbent GOP Rep. Juan Ciscomani against Democrat Kirsten Engel, who serves in the state senate. In The Washington Post, León Krauze characterized the race: « The Republican is focusing on the economy and border security, while Engel has centered most of her appeal to voters on reproductive rights, especially among Hispanic women. » Given how close Arizona is in the national polls, the ground game in these two districts could have a spillover effect.

Michigan’s 7th District, centered around Lansing and the 8th District, stretching from Flint to Saginaw, are both currently held by Democrats but are open seats. Rep. Dan Kildee is retiring and Rep. Elissa Slotkin is running for Senate. If Harris is having a good night, she could tip these two swing districts towards the Democrats as well, or Trump could do the same for the GOP.

These are the races I am going to be keeping an eye on election night — along with key contests that could determine control of the U.S. Senate, which I discussed in an earlier column. The easiest route for the Democrats to regain control of the House is through the upstate New York districts they lost two years ago, but the strong winds blowing through the presidential contest are likely going to have an impact on races in Arizona, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

If the Democrats lose the Senate, regaining the House will be vital. If either party captures both chambers and the White House, it could be a recipe for further polarization. Divided government might yield a paralyzed government. Either way, these House races will prove enormously consequential. 

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Catholisisme

Interior Freedom

(Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time-Year B; This homily was given on October 27, 2024 at Saint Augustine Church in Providence, Rhode Island; See Mark 10:46-52)  

PLAY « Interior Freedom »

Seeking the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary through prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Synod’s final report calls for all baptized Catholics to shape future church

Pope Francis’ three-year consultation on the future of the Catholic Church concluded on Oct. 26, outlining the institution’s challenges and proposing ways for all the baptized to be involved in charting a path forward.

Recommended changes include overhauling training for future priests, greater lay involvement in selecting bishops, expansion of women’s ministries and a revision to church law to mandate greater transparency and accountability throughout the church.

The 51-page Final Document was approved and published after three years of tens of thousands of listening sessions, continental assemblies and two major summits in Rome. It stops short of proposing certain dramatic changes — such as the restoration of the female diaconate or greater recognition of LGBTQ Catholics — that many reform groups have sought during the multiyear project known as the synod on synodality.

But neither does it close the door on such possibilities. The synod’s document notes that access to the diaconate for women « remains open » and calls for a church that does not exclude people because of their « marital situation, identity or sexuality. »

The paragraph that received the most no votes was the primary paragraph addressing the possibility of women deacons. While all 151 paragraphs of the document received the two-thirds votes required for approval, the section on women deacons received 97 no votes from the 355 voting members present in the Vatican’s synod hall.

The document, which was produced by some 400 delegates from around the world, caps a  legacy initiative for Francis — inviting one of the world’s oldest institutions to consider how it might become more inclusive and better capable of listening to all its members. How this process advances and how these proposals are implemented and enforced, however, remains more opaque. 

In remarks following the document’s approval by the synod body, the pope approved its publication.

Francis said that he hoped the document would be a « gift to the people of God. » He said that he did not intend to publish an apostolic exhortation, a magisterial document typically published at the conclusion of the synod offering the pope’s own reflections.

Instead, he said, the document already contains « highly concrete indications » to guide the church’s mission.

The pope also noted the work of the special study groups on some of the most contentious issues that surfaced throughout the three-year process. Their work is expected to continue through June 2025.

The synodal church, the pope said, now needs its words « to be accompanied by action. » 

Seminary formation, women and episcopal authority

Looming large over the synod process since it began in 2021 has been women’s ministerial and leadership roles in the church.

While the pope has said the proposal to restore the female diaconate is not yet « mature » and needs further consideration, the final document declares that the issue is an open question. 

« This discernment needs to continue, » it states.

At an Oct. 26 press conference following the synod’s final vote, Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich emphasized that the pope’s immediate publication of the document means that Francis has made the synod’s proposals « his own, » including to keep open the question of women deacons.

« The Holy Father has not said women will be ordained deacons. He has not said women will not be ordained deacons, » said Hollerich, one of the synod’s lead organizers. « This is not a decision for, it’s not a decision against. »  

The final document goes on to note that « women continue to encounter obstacles in obtaining a fuller recognition…in all the various areas of the church’s life. » It requests full implementation of all leadership opportunities granted to women under canon law that are currently under-explored.

The synod calls for a complete update to the current guidelines on how priests are formed and trained, and the document calls for a « significant presence of women » in Catholic seminaries.

While a special group was established by the pope to examine specific questions related to women, the body has largely operated in secrecy since its inception in March. After a ruckus earlier this month involving the leadership of the group, the final document specifically requested that the Vatican’s synod office « watch over the synodal quality of the working method of the study groups. »

The text goes on to envision a broader reliance on lay-led ministries within the church and for a greater voice for the laity in choosing bishops.

In a synodal church, the document states, the ministries of bishops and priests are marked by broad collaboration and greater co-responsibility with their flock, included within seminary formation and serving as judges in canonical processes.

Despite a centuries-long practice of accountability to one’s superiors in church life, the synod said that the dimension of authorities being held accountable to the community is « in need of restoration. »  

Transparency, accountability and evaluation

Over the last three years, revising the church’s decision-making processes emerged as one of the synod’s primary objectives.

The Final Document calls for a revision of the church’s Code of Canon Law from a « synodal perspective, » and in particular, a clarification of the distinctions between consultative and deliberative involvement in decision-making.

In addition, the synod recommends the « establishment everywhere » of finance councils, involvement of laity in pastoral and financial planning, preparation of an audited annual report for both financial matters and safeguarding policies and performance evaluations of all ministers and ministries.

The text also highlights the role of participatory bodies — such as diocesan synods, presbyteral, diocesan and parish pastoral councils. While many of the proposals are already mandated in U.S. and other Western dioceses, they have not been universally adopted by the global church.

« A synodal church is based upon the existence, efficiency and effective vitality of these participatory bodies, not merely the nominal existence of them, » the document states. 

« Without concrete changes in the short term, the vision of a synodal church will not be credible, and this will alienate those members of the People of God who have drawn strength and hope from the synodal journey, » it continues. 

On the role of episocal conferences, the synod declares that such bodies are fruitful in best identifying how to enculturate the faith and that local churches must have the ability to move at different paces.

While the text does not specifically mention it, one of the much-discussed topics of the Oct. 2-26 synodal assembly was the implementation of the December 2023 Vatican decree allowing for blessings for couples in same-sex unions. While the decision received widespread acceptance in many Western countries, some eastern European and African bishops’ conferences have refused to enact the decree.  

According to the synod’s final document, more study is needed to determine what matters of doctrinal authority should be reserved to the pope and what matters can be decided or enacted by episcopal conferences. The synod also encourages the further collaboration of continental groupings of episcopal conferences for a deepening of synodal practices and consultation.

Among other proposals in the synod’s final text:

  • Consultation from Roman dicasteries with bishops’ conferences and other relevant parties prior to the publication of major documents;
  • More collaboration among members of the College of Cardinals — the elite body responsible for advising the pope on church governance — in order for the diverse group to better know one another;
  • Creation of a new synodal study group to examine how liturgical celebrations can offer a better expression of synodality;
  • Establishment of a council of patriarchs, major archbishops and metropolitans of Eastern Catholic Churches to advise the pope; and
  • More formation and training for those working with minors and vulnerable adults to improve the church’s safeguarding efforts.

On Sunday, Oct. 27, the pope will preside over a final Mass for the synod in St. Peter’s Basilica, officially bringing the three-year process to its end.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include comments from Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich. 

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Echos des catholiques

Rome 24/10 – Day 26: Waiting for the bride

For the sun’s rising, I can report the hour of 07:34.  Sunset is still a bit in the future as I write at 18:14.

The Ave Maria is still in the 18:30 cycle.

It is the feast of St. Dimitri the 4th c. martyr.

Thank you for this day, Lord.

Welcome registrant:

N2SRK

St. Benedict saw the consistory list.

Last night took us to the Pantheon for Vespers for the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage.

Well attended.

The acoustics in there… horrible.   Quite simply.

One of my very favorite Crucifixes in Rome or anywhere.

I entitle this “Waiting for the bride… and waiting… and waiting…”.  She was over a half hour late.

Meanwhile, chess was played in the sacristy… but that’s about chess, so I’ll put it in the comments with the puzzle… a hard one.

(White to move and mate in 4.  Hard, but once you see it, you can’t un-see it.)

Chessy news… HERE

Please join up! I’ll get the credit.

In churchy news…. there is a good piece by the always interesting Janet Smith at Crisis.   We are on the brink.  We are on the brink of an election. We are more than one brink, more than one serious brink.    I believe she is right in her assessment of the severity of the situation in the USA.  A taste:

The only hope we have for changing the laws on abortion (and saving this country!) is to elect those who will work to defend free speech and freedom of religion, who will deport illegal immigrants, who will ensure that elections are fair. Bonuses may well be a recovery of the economy, disbanding the deep state, reducing government waste, and peaceful settlement of costly wars.

Another good read is Fr. Raymond de Souza at The Catholic Thing on the sinking ship the Holy See Ship Synodality (aka “walking together”).    A taste:

HSS Synodality set sail when Pope Francis announced in March 2020 the commissioning of a great new ship. The synodal process on synodality for a synodal Church will thus mark its fifth anniversary early next year. It has sailed through some rough waters, but even after five years, it is not clear where exactly synodality is headed. HSS Synodality has thus been on a voyage without a destination.

Perhaps the purpose is the voyage, not the destination…

You said it, Father.  That’s the point.  The outcome is the establishment of constant process that brooks no dissent that cannot be marginalized by means of listening and dialogue.  The goal is “permanent revolution” and that can only be achieved not through direct attacks on liturgy, law and doctrine, but by erosion through hints, dangling carrots, perpetual dialogue.   I grew up in a caucus state.

So, HSS Synodality (“walking togetherity”) has been sailing sailing sailing.  It has also been hulled a few times by the Holy See’s own torpedoes (e.g., Fiducia supplicans).

And… well… more chessy… At ChessBase there’s a good article about current World Champ Ding Liren, who is going to defend his title against Gukesh.  It’s going to be … painful, I think.   Ding talks about the psychological, emotional problems he has struggled with for years.  He is a compelling person with an interesting story.

I will never forget sitting where I am now and watching those last fatal moves in the tie breaker in Astana (… where Bp. Schneider is…) against Ian Nepomniachtchi (it’s pronounced Непомнящий, by the way). And Nepo’s reaction. He was pretty sure he had a draw. the commentators thought it was a draw. Then Ding pulled a fast one with a minute on the clock, playing Rg6. Ding refused a draw down on time and played for the win. Video of the end of that game HERE. Treat yourself.

And check out the great wines of the monks of Le Barroux, traditional Benedictines, in S. France.

PlayPlay

Offering prayers to the Blessed Virgin Mary

Catégories
Vie de l'église

I said my final Mass for the Oakland A’s. Baseball won’t be the same for me.

I’ll never forget the summer day in 1970 when, at 9 years old, I walked through the tunnel beneath the seats and got my first glimpse of the stunning green hue of the infield grass at the Oakland Coliseum, home of the Oakland Athletics.

Fifty-four years later, on Sunday, Sept. 22, I showed up at the Coliseum and headed for a different spot: the windowless room in the bowels of the park usually reserved for the team’s press interviews. I carried my vestments, chalice and altar cloth to transform the room into a chapel.

Celebrating Mass for A’s players and staff, along with Catholics attached to the visiting teams, has become routine for me for most of the past decade. But this time was different: It was the last Sunday home game before the A’s left Oakland, and the last time I’d be saying this special Mass.

It wasn’t the same as the church closings that have afflicted so many Catholics in recent years. But it was difficult, almost like a funeral Mass.

A’s Manager Mark Kotsay summed things up for the San Francisco Chronicle: « There was a last Mass this morning at the Coliseum, (with) Father Jay. There was a lot of emotion, there was a lot of power in that room this morning from people that invested their lives here and are rooted here. »

To this day, nothing makes my heart jump like the sight of that infield grass.

Tweet this

For most of the country, the grand finale of the baseball season is just getting started, as the cross-country World Series pits the Los Angeles Dodgers against the New York Yankees. But for many of us in Oakland, baseball came to a sorry end last month.

The A’s are moving to Las Vegas. And since their new ballpark won’t be ready until the 2028 season, they’ll play in a minor league park in Sacramento — nearly 100 miles from the Coliseum — in the meantime. It’s a wrenching departure, especially for A’s employees who will lose their jobs. But also for many of my friends and parishioners. And for me.

As a native of Berkeley, California, I began life as a San Francisco Giants fan, cheering on Willie Mays, Willie McCovey and Juan Marichal. When the Athletics moved from Kansas City to Oakland in 1968 I moved my allegiance to the team next door rather than rooting for the team across the Bay. I faithfully followed the exploits of my new team, especially during the 1972, 1973 and 1974 seasons when the A’s were World Champions, winning three straight World Series titles.

Since my first in 1970, attending A’s games has brought me much peace over the last half century. To this day, nothing makes my heart jump like the sight of that infield grass. I endured many cold summer nights in my $2 seat at Wednesday games, donning a pair of long johns to ward off the bitter breezes from the Bay. Over the years, a priest friend and I attended at least a game a week during the season. The late Fr. Dan Danielson would hold a transistor radio to his ear, listening to the game on the radio, while I took in everything live in the seat next to him.

During the past few years, I often went to games just to clear my mind. Yes, I followed the action on the field, but I also brought homily prep material. I returned emails. I composed articles for the Sunday bulletin. Sometimes, I even brought a Kindle to read a book while enjoying the surroundings.

Most Major League Baseball teams have a Catholic priest assigned to work with the organization to ensure that Sunday Mass is available for the home team. I’ve been lucky to serve as the unofficial Catholic chaplain/priest for the A’s. One of my parishes (St. Benedict in Oakland) is a seven-minute drive from the players’ entrance to the Coliseum.

When I was asked to step into the role, it was a dream come true. But it wasn’t a dream without challenges. I had to balance Sunday morning Masses in the parish with those at the Oakland Coliseum with the A’s. This became more difficult when Jesuit Bishop Michael Barber assigned to me another parish with two worship sites in addition to St. Benedict.

The ministry of Sunday Catholic Masses for MLB teams is coordinated by Catholic Athletes for Christ, an umbrella organization that connects with MLB organizations to ensure that Sunday Masses are available for Catholic players and front-office staff, as well as visiting players and their travel staff. Often broadcasters from the opposing team (and the As) would attend.

Depending on my availability and that of the players, staff and organization, it wasn’t unusual for me to minister to other sacramental needs, such as baptisms. I was also available to hear confessions or provide pastoral counseling for members of the A’s organization. Depending on whether I had Mass back in the parish, I also ministered to the visiting team’s pastoral needs as well.

Over the past few months, as the reality of the A’s departure became more apparent and with the final home game fast approaching, my role extended beyond the press room (where we celebrated Sunday Mass). My credentials enabled me to attend the games and wander throughout the Coliseum, where I encountered fans, stadium workers, first-responders, numerous parishioners (past and present) and lifelong friends. Common sentiments were sadness and mourning, along with a bit of anger, frustration and confusion. I spent much of my time in the stands listening to memories of A’s players and highlights of classic moments in the team’s history, as well as absorbing the pain of loss many A’s fans felt.

As happens in many major league cities, Oakland-area Catholic parishes, schools and organizations often purchased tickets in bulk to celebrate an occasion or as an outing. I would often find out their connection to the Diocese of Oakland and pay them a visit, so that they could see that a Catholic priest is associated with the A’s organization.

But my primary focus was always on those who attended the Sunday Mass when the Athletics were at home in Oakland. Over the years, our A’s parishioners included, among others, broadcasters Vince Cotroneo and legendary A’s catcher Ray Fosse. Current team manager Mark Kotsay faithfully attended our weekly Mass, as well as the organization’s vice president for stadium operations, David Rinetti. He served as the team’s liaison with the production team for « Moneyball, » the screen adaptation of Michael Lewis’ book about the A’s then General Manager Billy Beane. Rinetti, a graduate of local East Oakland Catholic schools, was the catalyst in enabling Sunday Mass to be celebrated at the Coliseum during baseball season.

At the last Sunday Mass for the Oakland Athletics, A’s skipper Mark Kotsay took me aside before Mass to present me with a team jersey, featuring my name across the back, signed by the players. It is now framed in my parish office, lovingly displayed like a shrine to a lost loved one.

Because in truth, with the A’s gone, Oakland will never be the same. And neither will I. 

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The synodal process should embrace the messiness of being church

The second session of the synod on synodality had fallen into a tranquil lull before an eruption on Oct. 18. NCR has reported about the frustration that boiled over when Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández failed to attend a meeting with delegates concerning study group five. 

Study group five has been shrouded in mystery since Pope Francis placed it under Fernández’s supervision to investigate questions that include restoring women to the diaconate. Roughly 100 of the delegates attended a scheduled update to learn more about the group’s largely unknown work. 

When Fernández failed to attend and staff circulated handouts inviting written comments rather than providing any information, delegates vented their outrage. It was a rough day.

This turn of events may be a good sign.

One delegate told me that the frictions that had emerged during the first session in 2023 had been replaced in the second session by a more subdued and polite reticence. Now in their second year of meeting, the delegates have been so synodally successful that they’ve formed a community — one apparently so harmonious that no one wanted to disturb it with the kind of parrhesia (« speaking frankly ») that Francis has called for. That reserve met an end on Oct. 18.

I arrived in Rome on Oct. 14 to teach my course on synodality and join a group of U.S. institutions of higher learning who had brought 140 students. We engaged in a public conversation with leaders from the secretariat for the synod, delegates and other synod participants. 

Before the ruckus on Oct. 18, I worried about this suddenly soporific synod’s success. Everyone I asked verified the same picture of a sleepy gathering. Some even said they were occasionally bored.

Teaching my course on synodality, « ruckus » was a word I had in mind more and more as I worried about the quietude in the synod hall. Francis used it in Christus Vivit, his apostolic exhortation that followed the 2018 synod on the youth (though, in his native Spanish, what Francis said — « Hagan lío! » — was « Make a mess! »). 

We talked in class about how the synodal process calls us to embrace the messiness of being a church. Urging a mess this way proceeds from a confidence that the Spirit is present when people from different starting points listen to one another in dialogue, speaking freely and frankly. « I trust the Holy Spirit, » Bishop Daniel Flores told us in the Paul VI audience hall, « The church has been messy for 2,000 years. »

Indeed, the church has been messy since before Peter quarreled with Paul. But quite often we avoid that messiness and tell the story of a church where nothing really changes or was contentious before our time.

That tidiness is dangerous.

It creates an impression that the church is an object of preservation rather than a subject of creation. Interrupting the action of the Spirit this way can take many forms. In our daily lives, we do it when we do not really listen to other people’s experiences. The cardinals can obstruct or frustrate the Spirit even when they choose a pope. And, of course, a synod where no one speaks very frankly also might be a way of frustrating the Spirit.

In every case, we are the ones who bar the Spirit from the room. And, perhaps also we are holding the Spirit at bay in how we respond to Francis’ call to synodality in our parishes and our dioceses as well.

I was thinking about this when one of the students who came to the synod was asked what the experience meant to her. She said the week had taught her to « appreciate other people’s backgrounds, » and instantly I could imagine someone scoffing. Of course a university student in 2024 would say that.

But pause a bit over that judgment and notice how much it presumes to know what the Spirit is doing and at what pace. We don’t really know what is at work in that student, and so the rush to that judgment is a problem. It is much like the way that skeptics dismiss the synod on synodality as a « meeting about meetings. »

Our desire to direct this synod toward concrete results or scoff when no concrete results emerge shuts the windows and doors of the house so the Spirit cannot rush in. We need to be more willing to be surprised, more patient while the Spirit works to change all of us.

The first session last year was exciting because it aired so many problems long gone unaddressed by the church. The synod made a pivot, moving emphasis from issues to process, in the months between the first session and the second session. Process does not grab our attention the way controversial issues do, and how we will do something also is harder to talk about than the results we will produce.

But process is important. We won’t reach anything like an understanding of issues or discern how God is calling the church to act on issues without a process that is inclusive, careful and prayerful.

Now is a critical moment in this three-year synod when we are confronted by the importance of committing ourselves to synodality as a process, learning how to be a synodal church. The ruckus that returned the synod to parrhesia on Oct. 18 might be our opening in this second session to reflect on that.

We must learn to be patient when answers do not arrive as quickly as we would like, remembering that is often how prayer works too. We also must become better listeners to the Spirit and to each other so that we can speak with candor and hear fruitfully from one another the frankness that leads us all into the Spirit.

We must learn to be patient when answers do not arrive as quickly as we would like, remembering that is often how prayer works too. 

Tweet this

Finally, we must accept the messiness that comes with this. « The protagonist of the synod is the Holy Spirit. » Our role is to give up our expectations while embracing all the uncertainty and messiness that will unleash.

It’s a frightening prospect.

But when we listen to the Spirit, Flores told us, there is no reason to « lose any sleep that the faith of the church will be compromised. » God is with us.

On a free afternoon, I walked the Roman Forum, excavated by archaeologists across the last few decades. To be in Rome is to see the passage of time in layers of stone. The dome of the Santissimo Nome di Maria church soars over the ruins of the Forum Traiani much as Pope Sixtus V topped off Emperor Trajan’s Column with a sculpture of St. Peter in 1587. The Roman Empire, one permanent, world-dominating institution gives way to another, the Roman Catholic Church. It is a sobering reminder in this precarious time for the church that permanence is our idea and history makes no promises.

Our expectation of permanence is a sort of a trap. It beguiles us to believe we know how things will turn out. There is no danger the church will disappear like the empire, of course. But our notions about what the church is or should be permanently is the trap synodality invites us to escape.

As the synod on synodality now races to its conclusion, it is time for each of us to do that.

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer

Catégories
Vie de l'église

As climate intensifies weather disasters, Catholic Charities deploys for recovery

Two days after Hurricane Helene barreled into the United States, a local sheriff in an isolated Tennessee town contacted Kim Burgo, Catholic Charities USA vice president for disaster operations.

« He was almost in tears, » Burgo recalled. « He said, ‘I’ve got no water in the town. I can’t get ahold of anybody at the state or in the county or at FEMA. Can you help me?’

« We sent them two truckloads of water very quickly to get that immediate need taken care of. I also made calls at the state and federal level to make sure they were on the radar to get the help they needed. »

The ongoing recovery across the South from Hurricanes Helene and Milton, powerful storms that struck back to back in early autumn, are among 177 open disasters nationwide that Catholic Charities is addressing as of Oct. 20.

The agency defines disasters as an event that’s gone beyond the capacity of the local community to take care of itself. Disasters can be localized and hardly garner any media attention, or be widespread, such as the one-two punch of Helena and Milton that wreaked devastation across Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia and Tennessee.

« I’ve been to those areas, » Burgo said. « For the affected people, it’s an absolute catastrophe right now. »

As rising temperatures driven mainly by human activities have fueled more extreme storms and weather-related disasters, Catholic Charities is responding to an increasing number of climate-related incidents, she said.

« There used to be seasons — a hurricane season, a tornado season, a wildfire season, » Burgo told EarthBeat. « Because of the changes in our climate, the seasons almost no longer exist. We see tornadoes in December and wildfires in February. »

In the case of hurricanes, hotter ocean waters due to climate change has been connected to more tropical storms undergoing rapid intensification, where wind speeds increase at least 35 mph in a 24-hour period. Helene jumped from 80 mph winds to 140 mph winds in less than 36 hours, while Milton’s winds accelerated in a day from 85 mph to 175 mph — becoming a Category 5 storm before making landfall as a still-dangerous Category 3 storm.

While some people may be more inclined to wait out lesser storms, faster amplification leaves less time for critical decisions, Burgo said.

« When it gets up to a [Category] 4 or 5, they have to get out of Dodge, » she said. « The problem is by the time it gets to that point, they have lost an opportunity to evacuate, so more people end up in vulnerable situations because they are being notified in the last minute and there is no place to go. So it becomes very dangerous when we see these kinds of climate change incidents occur. »

Deploying with a plan

After disasters like the recent hurricanes, the immediate focus for Catholic Charities is on providing items essential for survival, including food, water, shelter and safety.

« We want to make sure people have access to food. We want to ensure they’re in some sort of housing situation with friends or neighbors, or if they need to be put up in a hotel or temporary shelter, » Burgo said. « They may need hygiene kits or medically necessary food, such as for diabetics. »

In a widespread disaster like ones brought on by hurricanes, determining where and when to deploy and what is needed takes some investigation, Burgo noted. Some responses call for setting up distribution sites; others require mobile teams.

With the local Catholic Charities office potentially experiencing the effects of the disaster, such as power outages and flooding, the national office monitors local media reports for immediate information to determine the area of greatest need, which changes over time.

For Catholic Charities, deployments typically begin with Burgo or a small team to assess the needs. They review factors like available lodging, as hotels may be booked by evacuees and other aid groups.

« We don’t just hop on a plane and rush in like disaster cowboys here to save people. That causes more chaos, » she said.

« We wait to be invited to come in, » she added. « Then we work with all local entities to determine what other kinds of deployments have to take place in order to meet community needs. »

Disaster response is an actual profession, Burgo notes. Of Catholic Charities’ 65,000 staff members nationwide, the organization has a cadre of people trained, certified and accredited to do disaster work when called.

In Ohio, Mercy Health’s medical system has a team connected to Catholic Charities of Toledo that deploys to places struck by disasters. In Hurricane Milton’s aftermath, Burgo connected with them at a Tampa, Florida, distribution site where they were providing wellness checks for people who couldn’t get in touch with their doctor.

Names of potential volunteers are provided to local Catholic Charities agencies, where each diocese has its own guidelines for training, background checks and fingerprinting.

For Burgo, some of the most striking examples of the impacts of the recent hurricanes are within local Catholic Charity staff who help people but often are not spared by disasters when they hit.

« Sometimes their roofs are ripped off. Trees have fallen on their homes. Their houses have flooded, » the longtime disaster response coordinator said. « But yet they find the fortitude within themselves to say, ‘I’ll take care of that later. I really need to also take care of the people I care for on a daily basis.’ They’re my heroes as they try to navigate their own disaster recovery but also work simultaneously to help the community to bounce back. »

It’s important for staff members to avoid compassion fatigue, she added.

« We understand from being in the business that we’re not going to get a week off — or maybe even a day — for a long time, » Burgo said. « But it’s taking moments of self-care, whether that’s turning off your phone for a couple hours, talking with somebody, taking a walk and not overwhelming yourself with what’s going on. If you don’t, it can creep up on you. »

Dignity amid disaster

In the wake of the recent hurricanes, Catholic Charities USA has provided blankets and solar lights in addition to other goods and services.

In some cases, partner organizations donate items like hygiene kits, but more often, the supplies have to be purchased from companies outside the disaster zone. That can pose challenges, Burgo said, as states have varying rules and requirements about trucking in disaster supplies.

Many disaster organizations, including Catholic Charities, are part of the National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (NVOAD), which serves as an umbrella organization for coordinated relief efforts.

« We have the mindset that there is not one organization out there — not FEMA, not the American Red Cross, not Catholic Charities — that has the ability to meet all the needs of the community when a disaster hits, » said Burgo, who is on the NVOAD board of directors. « We spend a lot of time on sunny days getting together, building relationships and having plans in place so that at the time of a disaster, we just activate those plans. »

« We’re very much in conversation with them all the time, so we all know what’s going on before the disaster, » she added.

After a disaster strikes, identifying what items are needed immediately is a top priority for Catholic Charities USA. With wildfires, that means rakes, shovels and bins to salvage what’s left of a person’s property. With hurricanes, it’s « clean out » and « clean up » supplies.

For people looking to assist impacted communities, Burgo said the best help is financial help. Making a donation or sending gift cards is better than shipping unwanted items from your closet, she added. « We really want to be able to purchase things at the local level wherever we can so we can get the local economy going. »

Catholic Charities USA has set up a relief fund for victims of Hurricanes Helene and Milton that as of Oct. 21 has distributed more than $2 million to 11 chapter agencies in affected areas. All raised funds are directed to disaster responses, Catholic Charities said. Donations can be made through www.catholiccharitiesusa.org or by texting ‘Milton’ to 20406.

Catholic Charities views procuring supplies and services as an expression of the church teaching guiding its work. Its disaster response also encompasses spiritual assistance, which is often provided by onsite priests. A team of eucharistic ministers helps access the homebound to ensure their safety and provide needed services. The agency is also viewed as a leader within NVOAD in providing crisis counseling or mental health counseling, Burgo said.

« We want to be able to provide people the dignity and respect that they deserve when they’re at their lowest point in life, » she said.

Turning to the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer