Catégories
Vie de l'église

Third Sunday of Advent: A divinely subversive call

In Jesuit Fr. Bill Cain’s rendition of The Diary of Jesus Christ, we hear Jesus talk about listening to his mother sing her favorite song, the « Magnificat. » (We pray it today as our responsorial psalm.) Jesus challenges Mary, saying that the promises of the song may have been true, « once, a long time ago. » 

When she challenges him to do his part, he learns how very subversive it is to sing that the hungry will be filled and the rich sent away empty. The Magnificat isn’t a lullaby, but a prophetic proclamation.

Between Isaiah, Mary’s song, Paul’s message to the Thessalonians and the evangelist John’s description of John the Baptist, we get more than enough calls to prophecy in this last week before Christmas.

For ages, scholars have debated about the identity of the Servant of Isaiah’s songs (see Isaiah 42, 49, 50 and 51). The early Christians felt the servant described Jesus, the long-awaited, surprising, Messiah. Others suggest that the servant depicts Israel herself as God’s chosen. 

Today, especially in light of praying the Magnificat with Mary, we might look at how she and John the Baptist invite us to become servants of the Lord with them.

The first attitude we learn from Isaiah, Mary and John is that they focus on God. Isaiah says, « The Spirit of the Lord is upon me. » Mary sings, « My soul rejoices in God, my savior, » and the baptizer proclaims, « I am not the Christ … whose sandal strap I am not worthy to untie. »

What would change in our lives if we would say with conviction, « The Spirit of the Lord is upon me »? 

Sometimes we may proclaim something like that by our conviction that our opinion is infallible. (The mother of one of my closest friends used to say, « I’ve thought about it, and I’m right! » Of course, her tongue was blatantly planted in her cheek as she said it.) 

Supposing that we’ve got it absolutely right ends up being the polar opposite of prophecy. Mary and John, our guides, remind us that prophets don’t proclaim their opinions. They invite others into an awareness of God’s love, of the gift of God’s Spirit; they proclaim that grace that awaits us just around the bend if only we will be open to it.

Secondly, as Mary in Cain’s book challenged the boy Jesus, the prophet calls us into an ever-greater awareness of the needs of others and our potential to respond. 

Isaiah’s servant, like Jesus, recognized that being anointed was a job description. They were to bear genuinely good news, to listen attentively to the sorrowful and to help free others from whatever might bind them.

Mary’s response, her open-ended « Here I am, thy will be done, » became her life’s orientation.

Paul preached the same message from a different angle when he said, « Do not quench the Spirit. » How often do we feel a twinge about not responding or not knowing how to respond to something that is going wrong? We think of hunger in the world, wars, division, or discrimination against others for their orientation, ethnicity, age, gender, etc., and we ask, « But what can I do? » 

The fact that the question even arises in us is a sign of the Spirit, who will never call us to try something we cannot do. 

Paul tells us, « Pray without ceasing. » If our prayer says, « Here I am, I come to do your will, » we will eventually understand what we can do, even if it is no more than to stand silently by another, never pretending to understand all that is going on in them.

Ultimately, John the Baptizer reminds us that the coming of God’s reign is gift and grace. We cannot make it happen any more than the rooster makes the sun rise. Nevertheless, like John, we can live like prophets, helping others catch a hint that there is something good afoot, something deeper, and more meaningful than society offers. That’s what it means to prepare the way. 

Today, the Spirit of the Lord urges us to rejoice because we know that the hungry can be fed and the brokenhearted healed. We rejoice because, like John, we can point toward a road that leads to something unimaginably wonderful. With Paul, we can proclaim one infallible message: « The one who calls you is faithful » and will lead creation into fulfillment.

Mary sings of what God is working in our midst, Isaiah describes it, John announces that it’s coming and Paul reminds us that God does great things, not just « once a long time ago, » but today, among and through us. That’s divinely subversive!

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The Vatican’s ‘trial of the century,’ a Pandora’s box of unintended revelations, explained

Verdicts are expected Saturday for a cardinal and nine other defendants in the most complicated financial trial in the Vatican’s modern history: a case featuring a Hollywood-worthy cast of characters, unseemly revelations about the Holy See and questions about Pope Francis ‘ own role in the deals.

The trial had initially been seen as a showcase for Francis’ reforms and his willingness to crack down on alleged financial misdeeds in the Vatican, which long had a reputation as an offshore tax haven.

But after 2 1/2 years of hearings, no real smoking gun emerged to support the prosecution’s hypothesis of a grand conspiracy to defraud the pope of millions of euros (dollars) in charitable donations.

Even if some convictions are handed down, the overall impression is that the « trial of the century » turned into something of a Pandora’s box of unintended revelations about Vatican vendettas, incompetence and even ransom payments that ultimately cost the Holy See reputational harm.

What was the trial about?

After a two-year investigation that featured unprecedented police raids in the Apostolic Palace, Vatican prosecutors in 2021 issued a 487-page indictment accusing 10 people of numerous financial crimes, including fraud, embezzlement, extortion, corruption, money laundering and abuse of office.

The main focus involved the Holy See’s 350 million euro investment in a luxury London property. Prosecutors allege brokers and Vatican monsignors fleeced the Holy See of tens of millions of euros in fees and commissions, and then extorted the Holy See for 15 million euros ($16.5 million) to cede control of the property.

The original London investigation spawned two tangents that involved the star defendant, Cardinal Angelo Becciu, once one of Francis’ top advisers and a onetime papal contender.

Chief prosecutor Alessandro Diddi is seeking prison sentences from three to 13 years for each of the 10 defendants, as well as the confiscation of some 415 million euros ($460 million) in damages and restitution.

How does the cardinal fit in?

Becciu wasn’t originally under investigation in the London deal since he had been transferred from the Vatican secretariat of state to the saint-making office before the key London transactions occurred.

But he became enmeshed after prosecutors began looking into other deals, including 125,000 euros in Vatican money that he sent to a diocesan charity in his native Sardinia.

Prosecutors alleged embezzlement, since the charity was run by his brother. Becciu argued that the local bishop requested the money for a bakery to employ at-risk youths, and that the money remained in the diocesan coffers.

Becciu is also accused of paying a Sardinian woman, Cecilia Marogna, for her intelligence services. Prosecutors traced some 575,000 euros in transfers from the Vatican to her Slovenian front company.

Becciu said he thought the money was going to be used to pay a British security firm to negotiate the release of a Colombian nun who had been taken hostage by Islamic militants in Mali in 2017. Marogna, who is also on trial, denied wrongdoing.

The mysterious Msgr. Perlasca

No figure in the trial was as intriguing as Msgr. Alberto Perlasca, who ran the office that managed the Vatican’s sovereign wealth fund, with estimated assets of 600 million euros (around $630 million).

It was Perlasca who signed the contracts in late 2018 giving operative control of the London property to London broker Gianluigi Torzi, another defendant who is accused of then extorting the Vatican for 15 million euros to get the property back.

Because of his intimate involvement in the deal, Perlasca was initially a prime suspect. But after his first round of questioning, he fired his lawyer, changed his story and began cooperating with prosecutors.

Perlasca escaped indictment and was even allowed to be listed as an injured party, enabling him to possibly recover damages.

Only during the course of the trial did it emerge that Perlasca had been manipulated into changing his story to turn on Becciu, his former boss.

The mysterious women who coached him

In a trial that had plenty of surreal twists, perhaps none was as jaw-dropping as when a controversial figure from the Vatican’s past emerged as having had a starring role in coaching Perlasca to change his testimony.

Public relations specialist Francesca Chaouqui had previously served on a papal commission tasked with investigating the Vatican’s murky finances. She is known in Vatican circles for her role in the « Vatileaks » scandal of 2015-2016, when she was convicted by the same tribunal of conspiring to leak confidential Vatican documents to journalists and received a 10-month suspended sentence.

Chaouqui openly nurtured a grudge against Becciu because she blamed him for supporting her Vatileaks prosecution. She apparently saw the investigation into the London property as a chance to settle scores.

And so it emerged in late 2022, when Perlasca was being questioned on the stand, that Chaouqui had engaged in an elaborate plot with a Perlasca family friend to persuade the prelate to turn on Becciu.

« I knew that sooner or later the moment would come and I would send you this message, » Chaouqui wrote Perlasca in a text message that was entered into evidence. « Because the Lord doesn’t allow the good to be humiliated without repair. I pardon you Perlasca, but remember, you owe me a favor. »

Diddi, the prosecutor, hasn’t said what, if any, charges are pending for anyone involved in the Perlasca testimony saga.

Francis made clear early on that he strongly supported prosecutors in their investigation. But the trial produced evidence that his involvement went far beyond mere encouragement.

Tweet this

The pope’s own role

Francis made clear early on that he strongly supported prosecutors in their investigation. But the trial produced evidence that his involvement went far beyond mere encouragement.

Defense lawyers discovered that the pope had secretly issued four decrees during the investigation to benefit prosecutors, allowing them to conduct intercepts and detain suspects without a judge’s warrant.

Lawyers cried foul, arguing such interference by an absolute monarch in a legal system where the pope exercises supreme legislative, executive and judicial power violated their clients’ fundamental rights and robbed them of a fair trial.

Diddi argued the decrees served as a « guarantee » for the suspects.

In addition, witnesses testified that Francis was very much aware of key aspects of the deals in question, and in some cases explicitly authorized them:

  • The former head of the financial intelligence agency who is on trial said Francis explicitly asked him to help the secretariat of state negotiate the exit deal with Torzi;
  • Becciu testified Francis had approved spending up to 1 million euros to negotiate the nun’s freedom;
  • Becciu’s onetime secretary, who is on trial, said Francis was so pleased with the outcome of the Torzi negotiation that he paid for a celebratory group dinner at a fancy Roman fish restaurant.

In a religious hierarchy where obedience to superiors is a foundational element of a vocation, defense lawyers argued their underling clients merely obeyed orders from the pope on down. That included negotiating the exit strategy with Torzi, who was previously unknown to the Vatican but was brought into the deal by a friend of Francis.

« Torzi was introduced by Giuseppe Milanese, who was a friend of the pope’s, so why wouldn’t we trust him? » said Massimo Bassi, a lawyer for another of the defendants.

Milanese wasn’t charged. Torzi denied wrongdoing.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

‘A lot of work is still ahead’ say Catholics in response to COP28 conclusion

Nearly 200 countries at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai agreed for the first time to shift away from fossil fuels, the primary driver of rising global temperatures, as part of efforts to prevent catastrophic impacts from climate change.

The agreement signaling « the beginning of the end for the fossil fuel era » was reached early Dec. 13, nearly 24 hours after the scheduled end of the COP28 climate conference held in the United Arab Emirates, a top oil-producing nation.

While COP28 president Sultan al-Jaber and others in the final plenary session hailed the deal as a historic breakthrough, Catholic officials present at the U.N. summit had mixed reactions.

They saw the commitment to a transition from fossil fuels as an important step, but also expressed disappointment that the language was diluted and the document contained loopholes. Overall, they said it lacked urgency in meeting what science says is necessary to stave off suffering for millions of people from more extreme storms, sea rise, droughts and heat waves.

Addressing the summit as it drew to a close, Archbishop Christophe Zakhia El-Kassis, the Holy See’s nuncio to the UAE leading the Vatican delegation, expressed the delegation’s « concerns that the expectations of the youth and future generations, especially those of the people living in the areas mostly affected by climate change, have not been completely met, and that there was not a full response to the science. »

A deal to distance from fossil fuel energy

At the center of COP28 was the global stocktake, a multiyear process to assess progress nations had made in meeting the 2015 Paris Agreement goals, namely limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) — a level scientists say exceeding could trigger irreversible tipping points and put millions of people at greater risks of catastrophic climate-related impacts.

A U.N. report in September showed nations well off track from that goal, with global warming set to hit nearly 3 C by the end of the century, and reach 1.5 C as early as the 2030s. The stocktake process in Dubai was a chance for countries to respond with how they would get back on course, while also informing their next round of national climate pledges, due in 2025.

Over the two-week conference, diplomats and ministers negotiated what the final text would say on the future of fossil fuels. At one point, the head of OPEC urged its member nations, which include UAE, Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing nations, to block efforts at the summit to limit fossil fuel production. Island nations led a counter-push, saying they would not agree to a deal that would amount to a death sentence.

In the final text, named the UAE Consensus, nations recognized that limiting temperature rise to 1.5 C will require « Transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science. »

That wording was the first time in the nearly 30-year history of international climate negotiations that nations agreed to move away from fossil fuels in a final document.

The text also calls for « the phase-down of unabated coal power » and phaseout of « inefficient fossil fuel subsidies » — repeating positions reached two years ago in Glasgow — and for countries to triple global renewable energy capacity and double energy efficiency by 2030. In addition, it included language in support of nuclear energy, carbon capture and storage technologies and acknowledged the need for transitional fuels, a reference to gas.

Martin Krenn, advocacy officer for the Coordination Office of the Austrian Bishops’ Conference for International Development and Mission, told EarthBeat that the fossil fuel language in the text, while not perfect, sends « a very significant signal to the world, also to private investors and industry that fossil fuels don’t have a future. »

While a milestone, the language around fossil fuels in the UAE Consensus was weaker than the full phaseout of fossil fuels that many island states, civil society groups, faith-based institutions and even Pope Francis had sought from the COP28 summit. Some, including more than a dozen Catholic organizations, called for a new treaty to be adopted to chart the end of the use of coal, oil and gas.

Josianne Gauthier, secretary general of CIDSE, a network of Catholic social justice organizations, said that while the text « illuminates the beginning of the end for the fossil fuel era … the outcome fails to fully reflect the urgency of climate action or the reality faced by the world’s most vulnerable nations. »

« Fossil fuel producing countries and wealthy western states have not shown the courage to overcome greed and their lifestyles. In doing this, we continue to ignore the demands from Indigenous peoples, youth movements, and vulnerable countries to abandon our addiction to fossil fuels in a way that is fair, fast, funded, and forever, » she said in a statement.

Island nations, in a speech criticizing the quick adoption of the stocktake deal, said it didn’t provide the « course correction » needed to keep the 1.5 C window open.

Numerous scientific reports have shown keeping the 1.5 C limit within reach requires global emissions to peak no later than 2025 and be cut 43% by 2030, 60% by 2035 and reach net-zero by 2050. While the stocktake text acknowledges this science, it doesn’t provide a detailed path to achieving it, Lindlyn Moma, advocacy director for Laudato Si’ Movement, told EarthBeat.

« The outcome fails to address the climate crisis with the seriousness it warrants, echoing Pope Francis’ concerns about poor implementation and lack of oversight in previous accords, » she said.

The pope had hoped to attend COP28 in person, becoming the first-ever pontiff to appear at a U.N. climate summit, but illness forced him to cancel the trip. Two months before the conference, Francis issued Laudate Deum, an apostolic exhortation « on the climate crisis » where he called for leaders in Dubai to demonstrate courage and seek solutions for the common good, including the elimination of fossil fuels.  

In his statement after the UAE Consensus was adopted, El-Kassis said that the pope’s appeal in Laudate Deum — that world leaders « must move beyond the mentality of appearing to be concerned but not having the courage needed to produce substantial changes » — « sounds inspiring now more than ever. »

« The goal is clear, » he said. « Firstly, to accelerate climate action and transition away from fossil fuels in a just and equitable manner in this critical decade in order to keep 1.5 within reach. Secondly, to give hope and secure a livable common home for our children, where everyone everywhere can thrive. »

« A lot of work is still ahead of us, » the archbishop added. « And we have a duty towards those who rightly are demanding that we as leaders act in their name. »

Climate funding, adaptation, resilience

Beyond the decision on fossil fuels and a blueprint for climate mitigation, COP28 delivered results in other areas.

On its first day, countries operationalized the loss and damage fund, which will provide financing to communities most impacted by climate change. Nations pledged more than $700 million to the new fund.

Jesuit Fr. Leonard Chiti called the agreement on the loss and damage fund « a very delicate victory. »

Krenn, who followed the financing negotiations closely in Dubai, said the initial pledges are good but only a starting point, with some estimates placing loss and damage needs at $400 billion. He noted the fund’s temporary housing at the World Bank is a concern for many developing nations and that the fund currently lacks any provisions about replenishing it.

Elsewhere on financing, the global stocktake text noted that more funding is needed generally, especially from developed countries to developing countries, and that the long-pledged $100 billion annually in climate funding has yet to be met.

Krenn said there are concerns about how industrialized nations will fill the gap in funding on the $100 billion pledge, which was set to be reached by 2020, and exactly how they will accomplish other pledges to double financing on adaptation.

Nations also adopted a framework for a global goal on adaptation that directs countries to improve resilience to climate impacts on water and food scarcity, health, ecosystems and cultural heritage sites. Countries agreed by 2030 to conduct impact, vulnerability and risk assessments and develop national adaptation plans. They also established a two-year program to develop indicators to measure progress on climate adaptation. 

Gina Castillo, senior climate policy adviser with Catholic Relief Services, told EarthBeat that they had hoped to see more specifics around adaptation targets and reductions in vulnerability to climate risks. 

The intense focus on the global stocktake and the heightened attention on the loss and damage fund in the past two years has left adaptation somewhat marginalized, she said. CRS and other Catholic groups had hoped COP28 would signal a course correction.

« We are continuously supporting communities that need funding in order to be able to make those adjustments in their livelihoods that are going to help them manage these extreme weather events, » Castillo said.

The global stocktake text also stated the importance of linking efforts to address both climate change and biodiversity loss — a priority for numerous Catholic and faith-based organizations — « as well as the vital importance of protecting, conserving, restoring and sustainably using nature and ecosystems for effective and sustainable climate action. »

In Dubai, the locations of the next two U.N. climate summits were decided, with Baku, Azerbaijan to host in 2024, and Belem, Brazil in 2025. 

Nations are required to submit new, more ambitious climate pledges, or nationally determined pledges, at least 12 months before COP30 in Brazil.

Catholic presence at COP28

More than 100 officials with Catholic institutions and organizations registered to attend the climate summit in Dubai, which drew an estimated 85,000 participants, by far the largest climate COP to date.

A majority were affiliated with Caritas Internationalis — the global Catholic Church’s humanitarian aid network — and its national-level agencies, like CRS. Catholic youth organizations also had a strong presence. Boston College and Georgetown University each sent contingents of 20-plus students and professors.

An eight-member team was on the ground in Dubai representing the Holy See delegation, which participated for the second year as a full party to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement. A total of 18 members had registered, including the pope.

This was the second time in three years that expectations were raised for an in-person papal intervention at a U.N. climate summit. In both cases, a proxy, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, attended instead.

The Vatican delegation aligned itself early behind the phaseout of fossil fuels and fossil fuel subsidies (estimated at $7 trillion globally), following the lead that Francis outlined in his address to COP28 and in Laudate Deum.

A particular focus for the Holy See delegation was greater emphasis on climate change education and lifestyle changes, reflecting the pope’s belief, as stated in Laudate Deum, that « there are no lasting changes without cultural changes … and there are no cultural changes without personal changes. »

The Holy See delegation at one point in the global stocktake negotiations proposed adding language into the final text that would have required nations to include and fund education on climate change within climate solutions in order to strengthen awareness and promote transitions to more sustainable lifestyles. Ultimately, the final texts did not include any references to education.

During the two weeks, the Vatican delegation met at least three times with Catholics present at COP28 where they received briefings on the delegation’s work and offered input for their negotiations. In the waning days, Catholic officials formed a working group for a COP Catholic Actors Network in an effort to better organize and work collectively at future U.N. climate conferences.

The effort to elevate the Catholic voice in future COPs follows an increasingly visible presence of faith in the U.N. space. COP28 was the first-ever climate summit to host a Faith Pavilion — which Francis helped inaugurate via video message — and it followed a similar, though smaller, faith space at the COP15 U.N. biodiversity conference in Montreal in December 2022.

Castillo with CRS said that people of faith have an important role to play on climate change, to not only be a voice of hope in the face of apocalyptic forecasts around climate change but to remind individuals of the power they possess in pushing for solutions.

« We have that stronger role that we need to demand those in power to do more, » she said. « And I think, again, that’s an important message that the faith community brings to these conversations here on climate change. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The pope says he wants to be buried in the Rome basilica, not in the Vatican

Pope Francis says he wants to be buried in the Rome basilica of St. Mary Major, not in the grottoes of the Vatican like other popes, so he can be near his favorite icon of the Madonna.

Francis, who turns 87 on Dec. 17, also said he never thought about resigning this year despite a series of health scares. He said he has a trip confirmed to Belgium next year and visits under consideration to Polynesia and his native Argentina.

« It is true that all journeys are now rethought, » Francis told N+ of Mexican broadcaster Televisa. « If they’re close by, they can be done. If they’re farther away they are rethought. There are limits. »

It was Francis’ first interview since his latest bout of acute bronchitis, which forced the cancellation of a trip this month to Dubai to participate in the U.N. climate conference. Francis, who had part of one lung removed as a young man, appeared in good form and said he was now recovered and feeling fine.

While the job of pope is for life, Francis reconfirmed the possibility of resignation and said he has to prepare for any possibility. « I ask the Lord to say enough, at some point, but when he wants me to, » he said.

Francis has already said if he retires, as Pope Benedict XVI did in 2013, he would want to live outside the Vatican somewhere in Rome in a residence for retired priests. Francis has long emphasized his role as bishop of Rome and has a particular devotion to an icon of the Virgin Mary on display in the St. Mary Major basilica near Rome’s main train station.

After every trip, for example, Francis goes to the basilica to pray before the Salus populi Romani (Salvation of the people of Rome), a Byzantine-style painting that features an image of Mary, draped in a blue robe, holding the infant Jesus who in turn is holding a jeweled golden book.

« It’s my great devotion, » Francis said, adding that he had already decided he wanted to be buried nearby in the basilica. « The place is already prepared. »

Francis had two bouts of bronchitis this year and was hospitalized for nine days in June to repair an abdominal hernia and have intestinal scar tissue removed. He has been using a wheelchair and cane for over a year due to strained knee ligaments.

Many popes are buried in tombs in the grottos underneath St. Peter’s Basilica or in side chapels of the basilica itself, including all of Francis’ recent predecessors.

On travel, Francis confirmed that a trip to his native Argentina was « pending » and that the country’s new president, Javier Milei, had invited him. Francis has been dogged by questions during his entire 10-year papacy about why he hasn’t returned home, questions that have only intensified following Milei’s unexpected victory.

During the campaign, the self-described « anarcho-capitalist » called Francis an « imbecile » for defending social justice and a « representative of malignance on Earth. »

Francis, who had a long conversation with Milei after he won, seemed to have forgiven him.

« In an election campaign, things are said ‘in jest’ — they are said seriously, but they are provisional things, things that are used to create a bit of attention, but which later fall away by themselves, » Francis said. « You have to distinguish a lot between what a politician says in the election campaign and what he or she is really going to do afterwards, because then comes the moment of concrete things, of the decisions. »

Francis’ planned visit to Belgium is to celebrate the 600th anniversary of the country’s two main Catholic universities. In a statement Dec. 13 welcoming Francis’ confirmation of the visit, Belgium’s bishops said Francis was expected to stay a day or two, with a date still to be determined.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

As few details are released, fatal stabbing of Catholic priest rocks small Nebraska community

The fatal stabbing of a Catholic priest inside the church rectory where he lived has rocked the eastern Nebraska community of Fort Calhoun, a one-stoplight town where people tend not to worry if they forget to lock their doors at night.

Fr. Stephen Gutgsell, who served at St. John the Baptist church, was attacked during what authorities called a break-in early Dec. 10. The 65-year-old died despite being rushed to an Omaha hospital. Authorities with the Washington County Sheriff’s Office arrested a man, who was still in the church rectory when they arrived six minutes after the priest called 911.

« It’s a crazy world I guess. Anything can happen to anybody, » said longtime Fort Calhoun resident Stephen Green, who said he did not know Gutgsell personally, but has attended Lenten fish fries at the church and sent his kids to vacation Bible school there.

By Dec. 11, the church nestled in a neighborhood a block away from the elementary school was clear of crime scene tape as it prepared to host a wake for one of its members, but the yellow plastic continued to encircle the rectory — the modest home next to the church.

A stack of church bulletins sat unused just outside the sanctuary — with a note from Gutgsell about how he had planned to preach about St. John the Baptist’s namesake on Dec. 10. On the way into town, the lighted sign along the highway welcoming visitors to Fort Calhoun asked for « prayers for our church and our community. »

Gutgsell was attacked just one day after the Christmas in Calhoun celebration, where many of the town’s residents celebrated with a full day of events including a Boy Scout pancake breakfast at St. John the Baptist. The small congregation of more than 250 families is an active one known for its fish fries during Lent and its vacation Bible school programs every summer.

Fort Calhoun hosts only about 1,000 residents, located about 16 miles (26 kilometers) north of Omaha. The town is best known for being home to Fort Atkinson, the first U.S. military post west of the Missouri River, where volunteers dress up in clothes from the period as part of a living history program. It is about 75 miles (120 kilometers) south of Sioux City, Iowa, where authorities say the suspect in Gutgsell’s death was from.

But the priest’s stabbing was the second killing to happen this year in the small town.

« You know, there’s no murders forever and ever, and then all of a sudden, bam! » said Kevin Schultz, one of two pastors at the Cherry Hill church and ice cream shop on the main highway just a few blocks away from St. John the Baptist.

A day following the attack with little new details released, residents were left to speculate about Gutgsell’s killing. Prosecutors said they expect to file formal homicide and weapons charges on Dec. 12 against Kierre L. Williams, 43, who was arrested inside the rectory. He does not have a lawyer yet and likely won’t appear in court until Dec. 13.

« It seems like there’s more to the story, » Schultz said.

Court records in Iowa show Williams is facing a misdemeanor assault charge; he is accused of punching someone at a soup kitchen in Sioux City after getting in an argument in July. The criminal charge against him in that case lists him as homeless.

Green, who has lived in Fort Calhoun since he was 5 years old, said he has always known the town to be safe and he remembers riding his bike all over town when he was young. But he said the killing of Gutgsell — and the August killing of 71-year-old Linda Childers — are eye opening.

In August, Childers was found dead in her rural home in Fort Calhoun in what authorities believe was a home invasion by a man she did not know. In that case, William P. Collins has been charged with first-degree murder and other counts.

« It shouldn’t happen in a small town like this, » said Andy Faucher, who owns the Longhorn Bar and Grill where people gathered to eat and talk about what happened. Faucher said the fact that this latest killing involved a priest only « intensifies the scariness of the situation. »

On the evening of Dec. 10, the congregation held a vigil at St. John the Baptist to remember Gutgsell, who served at several different parishes across the Archdiocese of Omaha during his 39 years as a priest. In addition to leading St. John the Baptist in Fort Calhoun, Gutgsell helped at St. Francis Borgia in Blair, where the archbishop held a special service after the stabbing Dec. 10 and met with members of the congregation.

« We continue to pray that the Lord of mercy and love will welcome Father Gutgsell into his Heavenly kingdom, » Archbishop of Omaha George J. Lucas said in a statement. « May Our Blessed Mother intercede for us all as we grieve his death. »

The Archdiocese said Gutgsell was a native of Kansas City, Missouri, who graduated from the University of St. Thomas in 1980 and attended the St. Paul Seminary in Minnesota before joining the priesthood in 1984.

Funeral arrangements for Gutgsell are pending.

Kelly Tegels told KETV that she had just seen Gutgsell at Mass on the night of Dec. 9, so his death did not feel real yet.

« It’s going to be hard, » Tegels said at the vigil. « I’m bringing flowers tonight because he always had this altar decorated with flowers, and I know he would appreciate it. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Biden is hosting a Hanukkah ceremony at the White House as fears mount about rising antisemitism

President Joe Biden is hosting a White House reception the evening of Dec. 11 to mark Hanukkah, celebrating the festival of lights as he has continued to denounce rising antisemitism in the U.S. and abroad amid the Israel-Hamas war.

The president, first lady Jill Biden and second gentleman Doug Emhoff will attend the event with nearly 800 guests. Invitees include Holocaust survivors, members of Congress, state and local officials, entertainers, and leaders from across the Jewish religious denominations, the White House says.

A menorah is lit nightly during the eight-day Jewish festival, which this year is being celebrated from Dec. 7 until Dec. 15.

The White House reception will be led by Rabbi Angela Buchdahl, Senior Rabbi at Central Synagogue in New York City, and feature menorah lighting by Emhoff and White House staff that are descendants of Holocaust survivors.

Biden plans to talk about how Hanukkah is a timeless story of miracles, and that — even in dark times — we can find the light, the White House says.

The Biden administration in May announced what it called the first-ever national strategy to counter antisemitism. That laid out more than 100 actions, including a series of steps to raise awareness and understanding of antisemitism and the threat it poses around the U.S.

Still, antisemitism has only intensified in some quarters since the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas and other militants sparked Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, which faces heightened criticism for the mounting Palestinian death toll. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has warned of an impending « humanitarian catastrophe » in Gaza and urged its members to demand an immediate humanitarian cease-fire.

The husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, Emhoff is the first Jewish person to be the spouse of one of the country’s nationally elected leaders. Last week, he presided over the lighting ceremony of a massive menorah in front of the White House to mark Hanukkah’s first night, saying then that American Jews are « feeling alone » and « in pain. »

The White House supported a since-expired, temporary pause in the fighting as Hamas released some of the hostages it held in Gaza, and is pushing for another truce — but the fighting continues in the meantime.

On Dec. 9, Liz Magill, the president of the University of Pennsylvania, resigned following pressure from donors and criticism over testimony at a congressional hearing where she was unable to say under repeated questioning that calls on campus for the genocide of Jews would violate the school’s conduct policy.

Universities across the U.S. have been accused of failing to protect Jewish students amid rising fears of antisemitism worldwide and fallout from the war in Gaza.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates declined to comment on Magill’s decision to resign. Presidents Claudine Gay of Harvard and Sally Kornbluth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who appeared alongside Magill, have also faced criticism. Gay has apologized for her remarks.

Bates noted that Magill issued a statement withdrawing her remarks.

« That was the right thing to do, » Bates said.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Second Sunday of Advent: God’s promised future

When I lived in Peru, I knew a holy woman who always led the town in the traditional novena that prepared them for their big feast. She had a wonderful voice and she projected it so that a large crowd could hear her read those prayers at something close to the speed of sound. Everyone came in with a great « Amen » at all the appropriate places.

For us sisters whose first language was English, understanding her recitations was quite a challenge. Eventually, we realized that something seemed off — the prayers didn’t make sense; we were calling on God to do some ungodly things.

When she sat down to explain the rituals to us, she realized that there were a couple of pages missing in her prayer book — she was skipping over very important parts that would have made sense of what came later. We enjoyed the irony that it took people who spoke poor Spanish to figure that out!

Today, we hear some of Isaiah’s most famous lines, « Prepare the way of the Lord! … The glory of the Lord shall be revealed. All people shall see it together. »

Handel has taught us a magnificent way to sing about this and there are easier versions in which we can lift our voices with the same message, but what does it mean? Is it just a nice song, or is it supposed to indicate something important in our lives? (How often do we pay such close attention to the words of our hymns and prayers that they change the way we live?)

The beginning of Mark’s Gospel offers us a perspective on preparing the way of the Lord. Mark tells us that John the Baptist proclaimed a « baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sin. » 

Believe it or not, John and his message of conversion were immensely popular! Great joy doesn’t sound exactly like the emotion brought forth by a call to « repentance » and acknowledgement of sin. What’s going on?

John’s call to « repentance » wasn’t an invitation to penance. He was inviting people to see everything in life from a new perspective. Instead of concentrating on the past, on what they had done wrong or lost, John, like Isaiah, invited people to focus on God’s promised future — a future he told them was about to dawn.

What would that future be like? Not even John could really envision it —  he sent disciples to ask Jesus if he was the « one to come, or should we look for another? » 

Jesus didn’t fit the typical expectations for messiahs. To understand him, people had to return to Isaiah and ask about the servant he described. 

Isaiah wrote to people who imagined their lives as a desert wasteland. Life was dry, and arduous the road that led to unscalable mountains. Isaiah invited people under this depressing spell to listen to glad tidings, to discern the presence of God’s alluring love among them. 

It was not that mountains and valleys would actually disappear from their way, but the energy of divine grace would open their eyes to a future that would come into reality with each step they took toward it.

The repentance of which John and Jesus spoke did not look backward. It was a vision of an unimaginable different future so attractive that nobody need remain stuck or freeze another in their former ways. The « strong arm » of the Lord is not coercive; the rule of God is a hand up to those who desire the grace to move forward into the type of future for which we were created.

Today, between two major feasts of the Virgin Mary, we can look to her for inspiration. Her prayer, « Let it happen through me according to your word, » came not so much from a vision, but from trust that God had more in mind for her than she could imagine. 

Elizabeth proclaimed that in one simple phrase that could be translated as « Blessed are you who believed that God’s promise would be fulfilled » (Luke 1:45). 

The Second Letter of St. Peter says it this way: « Conduct yourselves in holiness and devotion … hastening the coming of the day of our God. »

The Second Sunday of Advent calls us into the sort of waiting that actually hastens the fulfillment of God’s reign among us. Like Mary — the Christian Scriptures’ counterpart of Abraham who forged into the unknown at God’s invitation — we are invited to believe so strongly in God’s future that we will not hesitate to risk what it takes for it to come about. Our daily prayer is simple and straightforward, « Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. » 

Will those words direct our lives or simply be rote phrases to which we can say, « Amen, » without feeling their power? 

Catégories
Vie de l'église

New biography of Caryll Houselander illuminates 20th century Catholic writer

She was surely the oddest Catholic author who ever lived. She went about London with her face powdered dead white, in vivid contrast to her natural carrot-colored hair, chopped off in front just above her eyebrows. Short in stature, she peered at the world through thick, round eyeglasses. She cursed like a longshoreman, liked to drink gin, and was rarely seen without a cigarette dangling from her lips. 

And yet Caryll Houselander inspired thousands with her urgent, compelling prose during and just after World War II. Her book The Reed of God is a lovely piece of Marian spirituality, still in print almost 80 years after publication. Houselander was especially popular in the United States where most of her books first appeared, since her publisher’s London office had been destroyed in the Blitz.

In Caryll Houselander: A Biography, Mary Frances Coady has done an excellent job of bringing Houselander back to life — a life particularly difficult to get a handle on because Houselander, like her mother before her, could be careless about facts when telling her own story. Her truncated autobiography, A Rocking Horse Catholic, was not initially distributed in Britain because her family complained of its errors and omissions. 

But Coady sorts it all out in this factual, carefully-researched biography. She tells of Houselander’s early years, the child of mismatched parents who divorced when Houselander was 11. She was a sensitive, artistic girl, totally unlike her impulsive mother, Gertrude. She spent her youth in convent schools, where she was sometimes considered a « freak » for her looks and mannerisms; but where she flourished. 

After moving to London with her mother and older sister, she attended art school for a time and went through a bohemian period, doing odd jobs to sustain herself. She decided the Catholic Church was hypocritical and walked away from it when asked to pay a fee for sitting in a pew.

Coady is especially sensitive to Houselander’s religious development. She was baptized as a young girl, went through an intensely devout phase, left the church briefly in early adulthood and came back after a vision in the London subway in which she saw Christ in all the travelers there. From that point on, Houselander’s books elaborated on the theme of Christ present, not just in saints; but in all persons — and in human history generally. 

As she wrote to wartime Londoners, « Because he [Christ] has made us ‘other Christs,’ because his life continues in each of us, there is nothing that any one of us can suffer which is not the passion he suffered. » In this way, her intuitive religious vision anticipated Pope Pius XII’s encyclical on the « Mystical Body of Christ. »

Houselander spent her early career as a struggling artist and woodcarver. Her first writing appeared in devotional periodicals, including The Grail magazine, where it was spotted by Frank Sheed and his wife Mazie Ward. Ward became a devotee of Houselander, constantly encouraging her to undertake new projects — including a novel late in life, and a treatise on guilt, neither of which was successful. But Houselander’s spiritual writing, now often overlooked, was devoured on both sides of the Atlantic. 

Ward also produced the first biography of Houselander shortly after her early death from cancer in 1954. Yet is not considered to be a reliable source because Ward accepted her friend’s stories at face value and prudishly glided over Houselander’s youthful affair with a British spy who went by the name of Sidney Reilly. Houselander was devastated when Reilly left her for another woman. She doesn’t mention it in her own autobiography, but for years afterward she kept Reilly’s photo at her bedside and even adopted Reilly’s first name, calling herself Sidone, or « Sid. »

Coady’s book restores Houselander to her rightful place in the history of spirituality, covering Reilly and all the other characters in Caryll’s colorful, fully-lived existence — including the living arrangement of « Gert, » her motorcycle-riding mother, with Iris Wyndham and her hoyden daughter Joan. 

For those who already know Houselander and those who want to meet her, this is a book for you.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Netanyahu and Israeli leadership must be held responsible for any war crimes

War crimes around the globe abound. The International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, needs more resources to expose the perpetrators and bring them to justice. A partial listing of global crimes against humanity underscores the monumental tasks before human rights organizations and the court.

Clementine Nkweta-Salami, the United Nations humanitarian coordinator for Sudan, said in a news conference on Nov. 9: « We continue to receive unrelenting and appalling reports of sexual and gender-based violence and forced disappearance, arbitrary detentions and grave violations of human and children rights. What is happening is verging on pure evil. » News sources report widespread killings, rapes and destruction of villages.

In Yemen, a Washington Post exclusive report in June 2022 noted that while Russia was bombing a maternity hospital and other civilian targets in Ukraine, thousands of similar strikes have taken place against Yemeni civilians. The headline read, « Saudi-led airstrikes in Yemen have been called war crimes. Many relied on U.S. support. » 

The article goes on to say:

Hundreds of thousands have died from the fighting or its indirect consequences, such as hunger, the United Nations says. The devastating air campaign alone — carried out by a Saudi-led coalition — has killed almost 24,000 people, a number that includes combatants and nearly 9,000 civilians, according to conservative estimates by Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) which monitors war zones around the world. 

In Israel, the Oct. 7 terror attack by Hamas resulted in gruesome and ghastly atrocities. Hamas’ house-to-house slaughter of families, defenseless children and even babies in their cribs and the brutal murders of parents dying while using their bodies to shield their children, demands a reckoning.

It is vitally important to raise our voices over the possible war crimes that have been committed against innocent people. Under international law, they are entitled to protection from the violence of both Hamas and the Israeli government.

Tweet this

Leaders like Mohammed Diab Ibrahim A-Masri, also known as El Deif, and Yahya Sinawar, the head of Hamas in Gaza, should be held accountable for the bloodbath they perpetrated on the Israeli people. Like Russian President Vladimir Putin, they should be hunted and haunted for their barbarism and should not rest easy for the rest of their days.

For the past month, we have watched with horror Israel’s response directed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his civilian and military leadership. They have been relentlessly bombing Gaza, resulting in the deaths of more than 17,000 Gazans, including more than 7,000 children, according to Gaza authorities. Most of those killed were innocent of the atrocities of Hamas.

On Dec. 10, the world recognizes the 75th anniversary of the United Nations’ adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is vitally important for us to raise our voices over the possible war crimes that have been committed against innocent people. Under international law, they are entitled to protection from the violence of both Hamas and the Israeli government.

In Gaza today, Palestinians live in desperation for the essentials — water, food, shelter and medical care. Hunger and disease in Gaza are destroying families and neighborhoods. Hospitals have run out of supplies. Operations are done without anesthesia or pain relief. It is a hellish nightmare. 

The Israeli bombing theory of « damage over accuracy » is the modus operandi of the Netanyahu government. Hence, the catastrophic civilian death toll in just one month. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesman, Daniel Hagari, said on Oct. 10 that, at least during the initial invasion of Gaza, the emphasis of the IDF was « maximum damage. »

The theory of « damage not accuracy » was employed when Hamas and Israel fought in Gaza in 2008-2009, a conflict that resulted in the deaths of about 1,400 Palestinians and Israelis. A 2009 United Nations report described the Israeli campaign as « a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate, and terrorize a civilian population, radically diminish its local economic capacity both to work and to provide for itself, and to force upon it an ever-increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability. »

A Washington Post columnist noted that in 2008 Gabriel Siboni, a former IDF colonel, « argued that the necessary response to militant provocations from Lebanon, Gaza, and Syria were disproportionate strikes that aim only secondarily to hit the enemy’s capacity to launch rockets or other attacks. Rather, the goal should be to inflict lasting damage, no matter the civilian consequences, as a future deterrent. » 

Palestinian American scholar Rashid Khalidi said in 2014, « Let us be frank: this is actually less of a strategic doctrine than an explicit outline of collective punishment and probable war crimes. »

Juliette Touma, director of communications for the United Nations Palestinian Refugee Agency, told NPR on Nov. 27 that 108 of her U.N. colleagues had been killed in Gaza since the war began.

The West Bank, where 3 million Palestinians reside, continues to be a land filled with tensions and acts of violence that threaten to break out into a broader and full-scale war. In the weeks since Oct. 7, Israeli settlers and troops have killed more than 200 West Bank Palestinians, according to the Reuters news agency

That violence and threat of violence has displaced many West Bank Palestinians from their homes. Settlers’ violence against the Palestinians has been increasing since settlers now have their own like-minded representatives in Netanyahu’s cabinet.

It is way past time for Israel to cut its ties with Netanyahu. His legacy will be his failure to protect his own people, actions and policies toward the Palestinians that have stoked the hatred that now permeates the region, appointment of racist cabinet members, and his personal criminal activity that has brought shame on his family, party and country.

In addition to the possible war crimes committed by Hamas and their leaders, it is paramount that the International Criminal Court also hold Netanyahu and his cronies responsible for the thousands of lives that are being taken in their indiscriminate bombings in Gaza. 

On Nov. 6, the organization Jewish Voice for Peace led a demonstration calling for a ceasefire and an end to U.S. funding of Israel’s bombing of Gaza. A Facebook post from Jewish Voice for Peace described the event: « 500 Jews and allies took over the Statue of Liberty, disrupting business as usual to demand a ceasefire in Gaza. We were joined by rabbis, electeds, celebrities, descendants of Holocaust survivors, and children. »

In their own powerful and echoing words, « Never again means never again — for anyone. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Jerusalem cardinal: Israeli, Palestinian leaders must urgently find political solution

The current war between Israel and Hamas may finally force a diplomatic solution to the long intractable tensions between the Israelis and the Palestinians in the Holy Land, said the Latin patriarch of Jerusalem.

Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, 58, who has served as patriarch of Jerusalem since November 2020, said that while there have been constant conflicts between Israel and the Palestinians since the State of Israel was formed in 1948 and even earlier, this time, it feels very different, and a comprehensive political solution may be the only way to stop the ongoing bloodshed.

« It is a political conflict, first of all, that now is assuming more and more religious connotations, unfortunately. This makes things more difficult because religion is less open to any kind of compromise, » Pizzaballa told the Rhode Island Catholic, the newspaper of the Diocese of Providence, in an Oct. 27 interview at the Latin Patriarchate in Jerusalem’s Old City.

Pizzaballa said that now is the time for leaders to concentrate their efforts on finding a viable solution for all those living in the Holy Land, including the Palestinians living in the West Bank as well as the Gaza Strip.

While the focus of the war has been on the Gaza Strip, after Hamas terrorists breached the border and killed more than 1,200 Israelis and people of other nationalities and kidnapped about 240 others in a brazen attack on Oct. 7, Palestinians living in the West Bank have become increasingly agitated.

They are decrying what they feel is Israel’s disproportionate use of force in its goal to dislodge and decimate Hamas in Gaza, ending the terror organization’s 16-year rule over the coastal enclave, since it ousted the Palestinian Authority in 2007. The Palestinian Authority still controls parts of the West Bank. The latest figures released by the Gaza Health Ministry indicate that more than 16,000 Palestinians overall have been killed, of them more than 3,000 children.

The IDF has also gone into the West Bank in search of Hamas operatives who are known to reside there, and outbreaks of violence have erupted. Tourism has all but ceased in Bethlehem, leading to the closure of many local businesses that support visitors, according to a local Catholic pastor there.

Pizzaballa feels that the time is now for political leaders to finally make good on slogans that have only paid lip service to resolving the long-term conflict.

« I think that, first of all, what is missing over the last 20 years is a lack of projects. We need a political project for these two peoples. A Two-State Solution was a slogan without content for many years. Now, we have to give to this slogan some content, » he said.

« Now, it is quite difficult, but this situation reminds us that it is necessary to find a solution, » he said.

The Latin patriarch has visited Gaza several times, with his last visit there being about seven months ago. He described the bleak conditions that many of the 2.2 million people living in the Gaza Strip — which is approximately six miles wide and 25 miles long — endure each day. Of those 2.2 million, there are about 1,000 Christians living in Gaza.

« The situations they are living in are very problematic, but, at the same time, I saw a very serene community, a Christian Catholic community. It is the smallest community and the less-complaining community. They are aware that they are much supported by us, » Pizzaballa said.

While the Christian community in Gaza is exponentially smaller than the Muslim community among the 2.2 million residents — nearly 90% of whom are currently displaced from their homes by the war — it has had an outsized footprint on everyday life there.

According to Joseph Hazboun, regional director of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association’s Jerusalem Field Office, CNEWA has been providing support to 17 local agencies working in the health, education and social services sectors of the areas they serve. The organization served between 300,000 and 400,000 people a year. It’s not their numbers; it’s their services that they provide, » Hazboun said in an interview with Rhode Island Catholic.

Pizzaballa said that Christians have mostly had normal relations with Muslims in Gaza.

« They try to have as good a friendship as possible, but of course they also have the radical ones, » he said, noting the existence of some radical factions among the Muslims who would rather disrupt peaceful relations with Christians than promote them.

« You can build your relations with those that are accepting you, » he added.

Pizzaballa was in Rome on Oct. 7 and said he had not yet received the news of the brutal attack on Israel until he was called by a priest in Jerusalem for an official comment.

Before he left to return to Jerusalem, the patriarch spoke with Pope Francis about the unfolding situation.

« He expressed to me his sorrow and pain and said that I should do everything to stop this war and to try reconciling the positions as much as possible, » Pizzaballa said.

« The pope is only repeating what he has been writing all along, that war is a defeat, any war is a defeat, » Pizzaballa added.

When the cardinal arrived back in Jerusalem, the tenor felt different from previous conflicts he had experienced in the Holy Land since he had entered the first of several positions he had held there since 1990.

« There was a level of perception that this is something new and that maybe, with time, it will become clearer, » he said.

The cardinal released a pastoral letter to the faithful of his diocese, condemning acts of violence and calling for a just and lasting peace in the Holy Land.

He denounced unequivocally the « atrocity » that Hamas wrought upon Israel on Oct. 7, noting that violence is not compatible with the message of the Gospel and will never bring peace.

At the same time, Pizzaballa called for an end to the « decades of occupation » and « a clear and secure national perspective to the Palestinian people, » which he said is the only way that a serious peace process can begin.

« We owe it to the many victims of these days and to those of years past, » he said. « We do not have the right to leave this task to others. »

In the context of a media interview, which he granted shortly after his return from Rome, Pizzaballa suggested that he would offer to trade himself for the hostages held by Hamas. The news went viral, traveling around the world almost immediately, even before he had a chance to discuss it with his superiors.

But the Latin patriarch feels that one must always be bold and assert their message of truth, regardless of how political officials may react.

« It is difficult, of course, because we are in very polarized positions, » Pizzaballa said. « Everyone wants you to say what they want to hear, while I have to say and what I feel in conscience I need to say according to the Gospels. And that is not immediately understood. »