Catégories
Vie de l'église

Synod focus on welcoming is what Jesus would do, synod member says

Finding better ways to live « like Jesus did » — reaching out, welcoming, healing and including others — was the focus of Sr. Liliana Franco Echeverri’s small group discussions Oct. 9-10 at the assembly of the Synod of Bishops, she said.

Franco, a member of the Company of Mary and president of the Confederation of Latin American and Caribbean Religious, or CLAR, and Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, briefed reporters Oct. 10 about the synod’s work on various aspects of the theme « communion. »

Franco’s group discussed how « the service of charity and commitment to justice and care for our common home nourish communion, » while Tobin’s group focused on welcoming and accompanying people who feel excluded from the church. Under the theme of communion with God and with one another, in the church and in the world, other groups looked at ecumenism, at valuing the cultural, linguistic and racial diversity of the church and at interreligious dialogue.

« There truly is a desire to be able to live like Jesus did, a Jesus who humanizes, who gives dignity, who includes, a Jesus who opens the doors for ‘the other,’  » Franco said. Living like Jesus calls the church to be « prophetic » in denouncing injustice and exploitation that attacks human dignity and excludes from society people such as the poor, migrants and victims of human trafficking, she said.

Given the synod’s rule that conversations and speeches are confidential, Tobin was less specific about the discussion in his small group.

As a superior general and then as a bishop, the cardinal said he had attended six previous synods, and this is « the most diverse synod I’ve ever participated in. » At the same time, he said, many of the questions, concerns and hopes expressed by Catholics in different countries and regions of the world are remarkably similar.

« We’re talking about things we heard in our own dioceses, » he said. « That’s what the church does; it listens. »

« We believe in a God who became flesh and blood, like the rest of us, who didn’t stay in some celestial isolation, » he said. « So, the church always has to be concerned with flesh and blood issues. »

The questions Tobin’s group was asked to reflect on included welcoming the excluded while proclaiming « the fullness of the Gospel truth. »

The question of outreach to those who feel « they are not at home in the Catholic Church, » including members of the LGBTQ community, was raised repeatedly in the Archdiocese of Newark’s listening sessions and was present in so many reports to the synod that it was included in the assembly’s working document, he said.

The archdiocese, he said, has « arguably the most beautiful cathedral in North America and it’s five feet longer than St. Patrick’s in New York, » but — quoting one of his auxiliary bishops — « it’s most beautiful when the doors are open. »

« And so, I think the real beauty of our Catholic Church is clear when the doors are open and welcoming, » he said. « And it is my hope that the synod will help us to do that in an even more significant way. »

Franco said members of the assembly have their « feet on the ground, » looking honestly at the reality of « a world in which there is xenophobia, exclusive nationalism, leaders who are committed to building borders. »

« And in a world like this, our world, the option of the church is the option for fraternity, it is the option for synodality, it is the commitment to understanding that we are all brothers and sisters, » she said. « And in a world and in a church where we see each other as brothers and sisters, there is room for everyone. »

When asked, both Tobin and Franco insisted synod members were free to speak their minds and that the concerns listed in the synod working document were those that came from listening sessions at the parish, diocesan, national and continental levels.

The reports of each small group for each section of the synod assembly will be handed in to a committee charged with writing a synthesis; synod members will have an opportunity to amend it and to vote on whether it reflects their discussions.

In the end, which is after the second assembly in October 2024, Tobin noted, Pope Francis will determine what and how to enact the synod’s conclusions.

« Before I left the diocese, somebody asked me a question about discernment, » the cardinal said. « And I said, well, you can decline the verb ‘to discern’ this way in the context of the synod: I discern. You discern. He decides. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

US bishops pray for peace following Hamas’ attack on Israel

Several U.S. bishops called for prayers for peace following Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

Bishop David J. Malloy of Rockford, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on International Justice and Peace, called for prayers for peace in the Holy Land and decried the « continued tensions and violence that erupted into warfare between Gaza and Israel. »

« The world is once again shocked and horrified by the outbreak of ferocious violence in the Holy Land. Reports have surfaced indicating large numbers of wounded and dead, including many civilians, » Malloy said in an Oct. 8 statement.

On Oct. 7, Hamas militants launched a surprise attack in southern Israel with missiles and a ground invasion during which an estimated 700 Israeli soldiers and citizens were killed, while dozens others were taken hostage and brought to Gaza. Thousands of people in Palestinian territories were injured and an estimated 400 others dead from Israel’s retaliation, including airstrikes that began hours following the Hamas attack.

« As we pray urgently for peace, we recall especially all the families and individuals suffering from these events, » Malloy’s statement said, adding calls for respect for civilian populations and the release of hostages. « Almost 50 years to the day of the launch of the 1973 Arab–Israeli War, once again war is spilling out in the Holy Land. With it brings the mounting casualties and hostilities unfolding on all sides, and increased threats to the Status Quo of the Holy Places among Jews, Muslims, and Christians further dimming any hope for peace. »

Other bishops, including the Catholic bishop of Arlington, Virginia, joined the calls for peace for those affected by the violence.

« Our hearts are shocked and saddened by the death of hundreds of people, and thousands more who are wounded or dispersed already, » said Bishop Michael F. Burbidge in an Oct. 8 statement. « It is my hope and prayer that the international community will work together to help ensure a peaceful and just resolution for the good of all.

« At this time, we also pray that the victims and their families find strength and support, » he continued. « May we join with one voice in asking God to grant eternal rest to the deceased, console those who grieve, and guide political leaders to bring an end to the war without further violence. »

His message came hours after Israel formally declared war on Hamas, a Islamist militant group.

According to the World Jewish Congress, the United States is home to at least 5.7 million Jews, and its Jewish population is second only to Israel, which has more than 6.3 million Jews. With about 1.9 million Jews, New York City is home to the largest Jewish population in the U.S.

New York Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, issued an Oct. 8 statement from Rome, where he is a delegate to the Synod on Synodality. Noting the contrasting peacefulness of Rome, he wrote, « From here in Rome, my heart goes out to the assaulted people of Israel, and to our Jewish community we cherish as friends and neighbors back home in New York, realizing with tears that their sabbath yesterday was anything but peaceful.

« A secure and safe home, surely intended by God for all His Children, wherever they may be. To have that home attacked is a sacrilege; to defend that home is righteous, » he wrote. « To the urgent appeals of Pope Francis this Sunday; to the pleas of my brother bishops back home in the United States; to the concerns and condolences of those brothers and sisters gathered here in Rome for the synod of bishops, I sure add my own. »

Following the public Angelus prayer Sunday, Pope Francis said he is following « with apprehension and sorrow, » the situation in Israel, « where violence has erupted even more ferociously, causing hundreds of deaths and injuries. »

« Please stop the attacks and the weapons, and understand that terrorism and war do not lead to any solution, but only to the death and suffering of so many innocent people, » he said. « War is always a defeat! Every war is a defeat! »

Detroit Archbishop Allen H. Vigneron posted on X, formerly Twitter, that he joined his prayers for a resolution to the conflict.

« It was with great sadness that I learned news of the violence in Israel. We have a number of citizens in southeast Michigan who have familial and cultural ties to Israel and Palestine; as Catholics, we stand in solidarity with them, praying for the safety of their loved ones, » Vigneron posted. « I encourage all people of good will to pray for a swift resolution to this conflict, and lasting peace for all. »

Malloy’s statement concluded with urgent prayers for peace and solidarity with those suffering from these events. « We call on the faithful, and all people of good will to not grow weary and to continue to pray for peace in the land Our Lord, the Prince of Peace, called home, » he said.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

New Iowa guidelines praised as a ‘milestone’ by LGBTQ Catholics and advocates

The newest U.S. Catholic document on gender identity and sexual orientation is being celebrated by LGBTQ Catholics, advocates and family members as a significant shift in how the church ministers to a community long on its margins.

Bishop Thomas Zinkula of the Diocese of Davenport, Iowa, released « Guidelines for Pastoral Accompaniment of Sexual and Gender Minorities » Oct. 4 and in his letter introducing the guidance says the first response to LGBTQ individuals should be « one of welcome, love, and respect. » 

Many of the more than 45 existing diocesan documents on sexual orientation and gender identity include policies designating bathroom use, attire and sports participation on the basis of a person’s « biological sex. » The Davenport guidelines instead are written around five principles. 

Other dioceses « have taken a one-size-fits-all approach that in most cases effectively deny the existence of trans people and exclude openly trans people from the life of the church, » Deacon Ray Dever, a retired permanent deacon with a transgender child, told NCR. « I think that any family with a trans child would find in guidelines such as Davenport’s a renewed hope that their child would someday feel welcomed in the church. »

Zinkula, recently appointed archbishop of Dubuque, Iowa, where he will be installed Oct. 18, said the guidelines were crafted in response to clergy, school personnel and parish staff expressing a desire to learn how to better minister to individuals and families in their parishes and schools « who are experiencing gender discordance or differences in sexual orientation. » 

The five principles expounded in the guidelines are: a respect for the dignity of every person, body and soul; a recognition that persons who experience gender discordance or differences in sexual orientation are real and do not choose it; a commitment to loving people first and listening for deeper understanding; a commitment to involving others in the discernment process, especially the individuals affected, their families and medical professionals; and a case-by-case approach with a willingness to « make reasonable and appropriate accommodations when possible. »

The gender committee — comprised of the superintendent of Catholic schools, coordinator of marriage and family life, vicar general, the director of Catholic Charities, and others — settled on a case-by-case approach because « blanket policies may prove ineffective and may risk doing greater harm, » says the document. « Building trust and dialogue are essential. »

Dever, who along with his wife shared his experience raising a trans child with the Davenport committee prior to the document’s drafting, said the guidelines were « highly significant. » 

They are « truly a milestone in the evolution of the church’s approach to the LGBTQ community, especially transgender people. » 

‘We have zero opportunity to work with or evangelize or help in any way families facing these questions if we have such a hard line that they say, « See you later, Catholic Church. » ‘
—Fr. Thom Hennen 

Tweet this

The emphasis in many previous policies and guidelines has been on defending church teaching « and the ethics of things like whether someone can transition, while this document’s first concern is: Is a person’s human dignity deeply respected? » said Robert Shine, associate director of New Ways Ministry, a Maryland-based group providing advocacy and support for LGBTQ Catholics.

Shine spoke to NCR from Italy, where he’s following developments at a historic monthlong Vatican summit — known officially as the Synod of Bishops’ synod on synodality — that’s convened delegates from around world to discuss numerous issues, including polemical ones like the role of women in the church and LGBTQ inclusion.  

David Palmieri is a Catholic school educator who has conducted extensive research on the policies and compiled them in a public folder. He is also founder of a grassroots network of Catholic secondary educators called Without Exception.

Last year Palmieri told NCR there’s a disconnect « between the legalism of many policies and the lived experiences of the human person. » 

« They help create a culture of fear, » he said.

The Davenport document, however, « is what guidance can look like when these matters are approached with a pastoral heart, » said Palmieri in an interview on Oct 6.

Fr. Thom Hennen, vicar general and pastor of the Davenport cathedral, was part of the gender committee Zinkula formed nearly three years ago.

« We’ve taken a slower approach to this, » Hennen said this summer. « We like to think we are taking a synodal approach, and we’ve learned a lot in the process — our own attitudes have changed. » 

The committee read and discussed theological and medical articles, attended educational sessions, and reviewed documents from other dioceses, the U.S. bishops and the Vatican. And committee members also spoke at length with LGBTQ individuals and their families.

Some bishops have claimed they’ve consulted with trans people, « but nothing about those consultations seem to show up in the documents, » Shine said. « In this case, it very much shows that not only was there listening, but transgender voices were heard, taken to heart. »

The document-crafting process also typically lacks transparency; in Davenport, the diocesan newspaper published several stories on the committee’s progress. 

Some reports said the committee has been criticized for not basing its work adequately on Catholic teaching. Davenport’s guidelines do not quote or footnote specific documents or church teachings like many others do. 

Pope Francis has described « gender ideology » as dangerous « because it blurs differences and the value of men and women.”

Yet on numerous occasions he has met with gay and transgender individuals and this summer told a young transgender person that « God loves us as we are.« 

The Davenport document shares phrasing used by the pope when he called for « pastoral prudence » and discernment when discussing an openness to Catholic blessings for same-sex couples.

Hennen said he anticipated there would be Catholics in the diocese who found significant fault with the Davenport guidelines. 

« We’ll need to be ready to get blowback from both sides, with each saying they can’t accept the document, » Hennen said.

But early feedback in the diocese is positive, according to Marianne Agnoli, coordinator of marriage and family life, while Catholic onlookers with disparate views laud it.

Abigail Favale is a writer and professor at the McGrath Institute for Church Life at the University of Notre Dame and author of The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory. She served as a consultant to the Archdiocese of Portland, Oregon, when it drafted its document, which has received much pushback.

Favale praised the Davenport document’s discernment-based approach.

« Policies can be comforting precisely because they foreclose the often difficult work of discernment, » said Favale. « But an approach of pastoral accompaniment, especially in the complex and sensitive area of gender and sexuality, needs to be responsive to the particular situation and the people involved. » 

Maxwell Kuzma, a transgender Catholic from Ohio who has criticized Favale’s writings on gender identity, said the Davenport guidelines were « amazing to see coming from a Catholic bishop in 2023. » 

« So often in Catholic spaces there’s an asterisk after the words ‘all are welcome.’ « 

In the Diocese of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for example, Bishop Donald DeGroodad explicitly states its policy, which bars transgender Catholics from serving at Mass, is “intentionally exclusionary, » adding that such exclusion applies to all who are in “a state of grave sin or public scandal. » 

‘This document’s first concern is: Is a person’s human dignity deeply respected?’
—Robert Shine

Tweet this

Ish Ruiz, a theologian and ethicist who has worked with LGBTQ youths, said the Davenport document makes him feel hopeful because it reflects « a true spirit of synodality, which, at its heart, believes the Holy Spirit is revealed through our daily lives. »

And unlike guidelines that indicate a wariness toward some medical professionals, like those in neighboring Diocese of Des Moines, Davenport’s encourages a broad consultation with experts. 

The Davenport document « represents a genuine quest to find God’s truth wherever it can be found, including both church doctrine and the wisdom of our medical and psychological experts, » said Ruiz.

Hennen said the guidelines « try to bring these two things that seem contradictory together — the rich teaching on Christian anthropology that we can’t toss out and a boots-on-the-ground pastoral approach. » 

Zinkula « wants us to be able to look parents in the eye and walk them through this, » the priest said. « We have zero opportunity to work with or evangelize or help in any way families facing these questions if we have such a hard line that they say, ‘See you later, Catholic Church.’ « 

Under the first principle — « dignity of the human person » — the guidelines say that « integral to our respect for human dignity are the Church’s beliefs about the nature of the human person, sexual difference, and gender. »

« These are rooted not only in what the body reveals about itself, but also in history, culture, and the teachings of our Catholic tradition, » it reads. « At the heart of our Christian anthropology is the concept that the human person is both body and soul. »

Elaborating on the third principle — « love first and listen for understanding » — the document states that « we tend to love those who are most like us and to question, fear, and even exclude those who are more dissimilar. Once we are aware of this and embrace the summons of the Gospel to love all people as ourselves, we do not need to be ruled by our tendency to define people in terms of ‘us’ versus ‘them.’ « 

The document ends with a list of recommended questions, intended to help parish and school communities develop their responses to different situations. 

Among the queries: « What are your biases or blind spots? » « What accommodations could be made, if appropriate? »

In November, diocesan clergy, Catholic school principals and parish ministry leaders will gather to discuss the document and how best to accompany LGBTQ individuals going forward. The event will feature two presenters, including Palmieri.

Dever said he hopes the Davenport document will influence how other guidelines are crafted. 

« Most dioceses in the U.S. have not yet promulgated documents on gender identity, but I expect that many are considering doing so, » he said. « The stated goal of the Davenport document is ‘to find a balance in addressing the real pastoral needs of sexual and gender minorities, while remaining true to the teachings of our Catholic faith.’ « 

« Those who share that goal, » said Dever, « will find in the Davenport document an excellent template to follow. » 

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Twenty-Seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time: Prayer that transforms the world

Who could fail to empathize with Isaiah’s heartbroken planter? The poor man loved his land with all he had, molding it with his muscles, caressing it with his hands — never a mention of a servant to do the hard work. Once all was ready, he built a tower from which to gaze on its growth and protect it. 

Alas, his hopes were dashed; the produce didn’t serve even for vinegar. What was there to do other than let it go wild and let the goats have their way with it?

Jesus turned Isaiah’s song of lament into a more personal parable. He transformed the relationship between proprietor and land into one between an owner and tenants. As we listen to his tale, we hear echoes of the preface to the Fourth Eucharistic Prayer: « Again and again you offered a covenant … and taught us to hope for salvation. »

Jesus’ parable recounts the underside of the story, turning it into a critique of his audience of closed-minded chief priests and elders. Underlining how the parable put the religious leaders on trial, Matthew described the treatment of the son in precise parallel to what the leaders eventually would do to Jesus: « They seized him, threw him out of [Jerusalem] and killed him. »

Responding to Jesus’ question about what the owner should do, the leaders pronounced sentence on themselves. Applying a theory of retribution, they said, « He will put those wretched men to a wretched death. » In other words, they should reap the same evil they sowed.

Jesus didn’t follow their avenging lead. Instead of a violent vengeance for their evil, he simply says, « The kingdom of God will be taken away from you. » 

That sentence subtly reveals that by both their treatment of prophets and their way of dealing with sinners they disqualify themselves for the kingdom that Jesus would make present among them. 

Jesus’ words continue to echo the preface we hear so often. Phrases like « You did not abandon us to the power of death » and « He destroyed death and restored life » reveal what Jesus teaches about God’s approach to fickle humanity. 

When Isaiah’s friend’s vineyard didn’t produce, the owner took away its protection and let it go wild. In contrast, Jesus gave people the freedom to judge for themselves: Did they want to live by the forgiving, loving norms of God’s reign or did they prefer a kingdom of their own making? God leaves the power in our hands.

Jesus’ question about what will happen to those who reject God’s messengers applies to everyone who reads the Gospel. It asks us, « What kind of realm do we hope to create among ourselves? » 

Over and again, when we decide how to reward or condemn others, we hear Jesus say, « Leave the judgment to me. »

We heard this in Matthew 13, when Jesus warned against weeding the field. As we recalled last week, that was the angel’s message to Joseph: « Do not be afraid » (Matthew 1:18-25). It is also the underlying theme of Jesus’ command to forgive. 

In the Letter to the Philippians, Paul offers another angle on this teaching. His message? « Have no anxiety. » 

Any sense that this is a Pollyanna approach gets kiboshed when we remember that Paul was writing from prison. He found his situation of confinement and danger of death a good place from which to teach about prayer. 

« Yes, » he says, « make your requests known to God, ask and do it with thanksgiving! »

He’s not saying that the God « who makes all things work for good » (Romans 8:28) is unaware, but rather that asking for God’s help will keep praying people attentive to how God would lead them forth. Thanksgiving keeps us conscious of how many ways God has been present to us. Because it is based on remembering God’s good care, requesting help with gratitude becomes the recipe for knowing « the peace of God that surpasses all understanding. »

Today’s readings invite us into at least two styles of prayer. The first, as Paul says, is to pray with the trust that produces peace, remembering that God urges us toward unimaginable good in every circumstance. 

The second might be more of a loving contemplation. Following Isaiah’s lead, we open ourselves to feel with the God of the vineyard, the owner who is laden with almost unbearable sadness at what has happened to what he had created with such care. 

The dynamic of both of these prayers is the same. They lead to love of God, to a life that Paul calls honorable, just, pure, lovely, gracious, excellent, etc. Such prayer also leads us into the mustard-seed fruitfulness that transforms the world.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Biden administration to expand US-Mexico border wall in Texas

The U.S. government is moving ahead with plans to extend a border wall in South Texas, an action long opposed by the U.S. Catholic bishops.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security publicized a decision Oct. 5 to waive 26 federal laws — most of them involving environmental reviews — to allow the building of 20 more miles of the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

However, President Joe Biden has said he does not believe border walls work to prevent migrants from entering the United States illegally, and he has been consistently opposed to their construction, ordering a construction pause on his first day in his post in 2021.

Speaking with reporters Oct. 5, Biden said he had no choice but to allow the building to move forward. « The money was appropriated for the border wall, » he said. « I can’t stop that. »

The funds were appropriated in 2019 under the Trump administration. Biden was unsuccessful in getting lawmakers to redirect them, and the funding requires the money to be used for the wall, with construction to be completed this year.

The DHS announcement said the construction will be in Starr County, Texas, which the Border Patrol says is part of a sector in the Rio Grande Valley with « high illegal entry. » Government data for the current budget year recorded 245,000 illegal entries in the sector, which includes more than 20 Texas counties.

« There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States in the project areas, » Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of Homeland Security, stated in the DHS notice.

In a separate statement Oct. 5, Mayorkas clarified that « there is no new Administration policy with respect to border walls » and the suggestion that the Biden administration has changed its policy is inaccurate.

« From day one, this Administration has made clear that a border wall is not the answer. That remains our position and our position has never wavered. The language in the Federal Register notice is being taken out of context and it does not signify any change in policy whatsoever, » he said.

In February 2019, two leading U.S. bishops said they opposed President Donald Trump’s plan to redirect federal funds previously appropriated elsewhere to build a border wall.

« We are deeply concerned about the President’s action to fund the construction of a wall along the U.S./Mexico border, which circumvents the clear intent of Congress to limit funding of a wall. We oppose the use of these funds to further the construction of the wall, » Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, who was then president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Bishop Joe Vásquez of Austin, Texas, then-chairman of the conference’s Committee on Migration, said in a joint statement. « The wall first and foremost is a symbol of division and animosity between two friendly countries. We remain steadfast and resolute in the vision articulated by Pope Francis that at this time we need to be building bridges and not walls. »

Other bishops joined their voices to that position, with a dozen signing a statement soon after to oppose a southern border wall. They called it « an ineffective use of resources » that would « destroy parts of the environment, disrupt the livelihoods of ranchers and farmers, weaken cooperation and commerce between border communities, and, at least in one instance, undermine the right to the freedom of worship. »

« The truth is, » the statement continued, « that the majority of persons coming to the U.S.-Mexico border are asylum-seekers, many of whom are women and children from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador who are fleeing persecution and violence in their home countries. Along their journey to safety, they encounter many dangers. A wall would not keep them safe from those dangers. Rather, a wall would further subject them to harm by drug cartels, smugglers and human traffickers. »

They pointed to the effects of a border wall constructed in the 1990s in the San Diego area, which they said resulted in smugglers driving migrants to cross the border in remote areas such as the Arizona desert.

The decision to continue wall construction comes as Republicans in the House and Senate are seeking to defund nongovernmental organizations that provide services to migrants along the border.

On May 11, the House of Representatives passed the Secure the Border Act just before the expiration of the Title 42, a COVID-19-era health policy providing for the immediate expulsion of migrants to Mexico.

Passage of the Secure the Border Act in the Democrat-controlled Senate is uncertain. Two Republicans, Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ted Cruz of Texas, have introduced a Senate version of the act. Like the House bill, it would require border wall construction to resume.

« President Biden’s refusal to enforce the law at our southern border has allowed drug trafficking, human smuggling and illicit cartel activity to poison the United States. Every state in the nation, including Iowa, is now a border state, » Grassley said in a statement.

Cruz said the bill would stop the border crisis « dead in its tracks by building the wall, ratcheting up asylum standards, increasing the number of Border Patrol agents, and implementing effective border security policies. »

Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas, in a letter to Congress in May, said the bill would « fundamentally weaken our nation’s decades-long commitment to humanitarian protection. »

In a similar letter sent Sept. 28 to U.S. senators about the bill, Seitz reiterated that position, noting in both letters, « We have long opposed the construction of a wall spanning the entire U.S.-Mexico border, especially with the dangers it poses to human life and the environment. »

Seitz is chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Migration.

Catholic assistance to migrants along the U.S.-Mexico border includes the Kino Border Initiative’s shelter and legal assistance in Nogales, Mexico, and the Hope Border Institute, which operates in Juárez, Mexico, in collaboration with the El Paso Diocese to provide food and clothing.

Dylan Corbett, Hope Border Institute executive director, issued a quick response to both the wall expansion and the recent negotiations to increase deportation flights to Venezuela. « The social and political crisis in Venezuela is real and deep, » he said. « In the last decade, close to 8 million people have been forced to flee.

« The time and energy this administration is spending defending border walls and deploying our chief diplomats and policymakers to negotiate with Mexico and the Maduro Administration to keep people out is misguided and will again prove ineffective, » he continued.

He said the crisis « requires leading with political courage, creativity and compassion. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Synod’s focus on listening may signal power shift in Catholic Church, says sister

Listening is a key word at the synod, but it’s also a way to « shift the feeling that the truth resides at the top of the hierarchy » in any church structure, said Sr. Patricia Murray, just before the start of the first session of the Synod of Bishops on Oct. 4.

Murray, a leader of the Rome-based umbrella group representing Catholic sisters across the world and one of about 40 sisters taking part in the Synod, said: « We’re saying the truth resides in the body [of the church]. We listen to the body. »

« Now, those who have responsibility in the church and in religious congregations, having listened, then are better informed to take a decision in the Holy Spirit, » Murray, executive secretary of the International Union of Superiors General, or UISG, told Global Sisters Report.

Don’t count on the synod’s monthlong focus on listening as a one-time event or one that will stay in Rome, said Murray, adding that the process may become « a new way of life, a new way of leading » the church and its organizations.

« When we’re discussing things or looking at important issues, we often we leap right into the business, if you like, without listening to one another, listening to the word of God, » said Murray, a member of the Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary also known as the Loreto Sisters. « However, this is a way of really going a bit deeper, much deeper, as a Christian community gathered, and to listen to what’s moving in the hearts of people. »

UISG already has started a process trying to inculcate that « new way » to follow among religious communities that the organization serves globally, she said, with introductory sessions in multiple languages via Zoom before the synod that will continue for the next three years. 

« What does it look like? It will look like formation, understanding what synodality means, because there’s a lot of confusion about the term, » Murray told GSR. « It’s a way of really deep listening to God’s Spirit in leading us, whether at a personal level or at group level. »

If the first day of the synod is any indication, it involves some reflection, a little bit of music, some quiet time, prayer, silence and listening — to oneself and others. And it offers a glimpse at what synod members like Murray are experiencing this month.

« We’re searching for guidance of the Holy Spirit, so in a sense, often we begin a meeting and we pray for guidance to the Holy Spirit. However, this is a way of really going a bit deeper, much deeper, as the Christian community gathered, and to listen to what’s moving in the hearts of people, » she told GSR. 

Murray is one of five UISG members participating in the synod, which includes the organization’s newly appointed president, Sr. Mary Barron, of the Congregation of the Sisters of Our Lady of Apostles; Mercy Sr. Elizabeth Mary Davis; Sr. Elysée Izerimana, of the Working Sisters of the Holy House of Nazareth, and; Sr. Maria Nirmalini, a member of the Sisters of the Apostolic Carmel.

While listening and praying already are prevalent in religious communities, the synod’s process offers a slightly different style, one similar to the process of discernment posed by St. Ignatius of Loyola, Murray said. 

« There are other spiritualities that have other ways of discerning, but one way is to name what is moving within you? Where do you feel God is calling? Where is the Spirit calling me personally at this time? We share around the circle, » she said. 

« Then in the second round, we say: ‘What have I heard my brothers and sisters saying that really has struck me or touched me, moved me?’ Then we share that again without discussing. It’s deep listening. It’s listening to God speaking to each one of us, because that’s what we’re saying, it’s our baptismal authority, that God speaks to each person. The task is to listen. »

Following that step, there is a « third round, » she said. 

« We begin to say, ‘Now, what’s been said to us here?’ It’s a much more free-flowing, open discussion, but having listened deeply. So often, we get into a … debating mode in meetings, whereas this is inviting us to a deeper way of listening. »

And it’s a process that can be implemented at any level in the universal church, Murray said, but for the purpose of UISG’s members, it means introducing leadership in religious congregations and those leading provinces to a new path. 

« It’s learning to be much more attentive. It’s a practice, it’s a spiritual practice, » she said. 

Catégories
Vie de l'église

In ‘Laudate Deum,’ Pope Francis presents a compelling climate crisis apologia

With a degree of urgency appropriate for the planetary catastrophe we face today, Pope Francis’ latest apostolic exhortation, Laudate Deum, « to all people of good will on the climate crisis, » builds on the important insights of his 2015 encyclical letter « Laudato Si’, On Care for our Common Home. » That the pope has explicitly described the current state of the climate as a « crisis » could be viewed as affirming what climate activist Greta Thunberg said in her 2019 address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: « Our house is on fire. I am here to say, our house is on fire. » 

Later in the same address, Thunberg pleaded to all who would listen: « We are now at a time in history where everyone with any insight of the climate crisis that threatens our civilisation — and the entire biosphere — must speak out in clear language, no matter how uncomfortable and unprofitable that may be. We must change almost everything in our current societies. »

Laudate Deum is, in a sense, Pope Francis’s response to Thunberg’s own exhortation.

Like the oracles of other prophets, the pope’s message is one sure to upset the powerful, wealthy and comfortable. 

While in the buildup to its release some people have been describing this document as a second Laudato Si’ or, more colloquially, its « sequel, » the pope presents this text as more of an addendum and update to his earlier encyclical. He states in the opening section of the new exhortation that Laudato Si’ was his effort to share with us his « heartfelt concerns about the care of our common home. » However, in the eight years since Laudato Si‘ was promulgated, the situation has grown into a graver emergency with the stakes increasing by the day. 

He writes: « with the passage of time, I have realized that our responses have not been adequate, while the world in which we live is collapsing and may be nearing the breaking point. In addition to this possibility, it is indubitable that the impact of climate change will increasingly prejudice the lives and families of many persons. We will feel its effects in the areas of healthcare, sources of employment, access to resources, housing, forced migration, etc. »

What follows is both an exhortation in the truest sense — a written or spoken message that emphatically urges someone to do something — and an apologia, a theological and rhetorical defense of truth and faith. On this latter point, Laudate Deum reads like the treatises of the early Christian theologians (think the second century St. Irenaeus of Lyons, for example) who sought to articulately defend the fundamentals of Christian faith against cultural and religious skepticism or hostility. These theological « apologists » often also used the best intellectual and cultural resources of the time to make their points.

In this exhortation, Pope Francis does likewise. He draws on clear, intelligent, scientific data from sources that include the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations Environment Programme and the National Oceanic and the U.S. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). He also draws on many great resources from within the Catholic Church, including previous encyclicals, Scripture and spiritual writings like that of St. Francis of Assisi, of course.

What is striking about the powerful tone of Laudate Deum is the way in which the pope does not shy away from addressing climate change deniers head-on, including those within the faith community. In fact, he says: « I feel obliged to make these clarifications, which may appear obvious, because of certain dismissive and scarcely reasonable opinions that I encounter, even within the Catholic Church. » 

There is a clear prophetic valence to this text, and it bolsters the rhetorical style of an exhortation and apologia. The biblical prophets were always able to see at once both the world as it truly is (« the signs of the times, » as the Second Vatican Council put it) and the world as God intends it to be and calls us to live. The prophet proclaims the gap between those two visions, and exhorts the hearers to repent, change and live according to God’s will. And Pope Francis spends a good amount of time examining the world as it truly is, decrying the worsening circumstances of our « common home » on account of human indifference and what he calls the « technocratic paradigm. »

Like the oracles of other prophets, the pope’s message is one sure to upset the powerful, wealthy and comfortable. In our contemporary context, those who benefit most from the circumstances that are contributing to the climate crisis are those who live in the Global North, especially in North America. Pope Francis explicitly calls out the United States and similar countries for their disproportionate impact and, therefore, disproportionate responsibility to do something.

If we consider that emissions per individual in the United States are about two times greater than those of individuals living in China, and about seven times greater than the average of the poorest countries, we can state that a broad change in the irresponsible lifestyle connected with the Western model would have a significant long-term impact. As a result, along with indispensable political decisions, we would be making progress along the way to genuine care for one another.

As Scripture recounts, those who benefit from the unjust status quo are typically not happy with the prophetic message and seek to silence the prophet, which might explain why the center of anti-Francis hostility is found in the United States. 

It is also interesting that, early in the document and shortly before mentioning the United States for the first time, Pope Francis notes that the climate crisis is a life issue! He writes: « This is a global social issue and one intimately related to the dignity of human life. » As someone who has previously argued in these pages that « climate change is the most important life issue, » I was delighted to see the pope directly expressI this point.

Overall, I think this apostolic exhortation is an important addition to Laudato Si’, which is itself prophetic in so many ways. However, for all that the prophetic and apologetic tenor Laudate Deum accomplishes, it still falls short of fully embracing the radical vision of God’s family of creation found in the writings and model of the pope’s namesake: St. Francis of Assisi. 

It’s true that Pope Francis comes close — drawing on the medieval saint’s inspiration to frame his magisterial teaching — and even affirms the inherent interconnectedness and interdependence of the community of creation. « God has united us to all his creatures. Nonetheless, the technocratic paradigm can isolate us from the world that surrounds us and deceive us by making us forget that the entire world is a ‘contact zone.' » And, later, he adds: « human life is incomprehensible and unsustainable without other creatures. »

Earlier in the exhortation, he also stated that, « the world that surrounds us is not an object of exploitation, unbridled use and unlimited ambition. Nor can we claim that nature is a mere ‘setting’ in which we develop our lies and our projects. » He then quotes Laudato Si’ and writes: « For ‘we are part of nature, included in it and thus in constant interaction with it,’ and thus ‘we [do] not look at the world from without but from within.’  » 

And yet, if unbridled anthropocentrism and uncritical embrace of a technocratic paradigm are at the heart of the urgent climate crisis before us, then perhaps we need a paradigm shift, a different hermeneutical approach to seeing ourselves and the rest of creation. St. Francis of Assisi made it clear that he recognized that we are part of God’s creation, that indeed we are creatures too, and that until we recognize that we are part of the divine family of creation and not merely stewards, gardeners, tillers or any other sort of hired hand on behalf of God, then we will continue to delude ourselves into thinking we are always an arm’s-length (or more) from the rest of the created world. 

Despite the areas that could have been improved in the tradition of St. Francis, Pope Francis’s exhortation is still a powerful apologia for why people of faith cannot exempt themselves from the work that is needed today. As he says near the conclusion of the text, there is always something we can do and « every little bit helps. » 

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Boston Archdiocese opposes canceling civil statute of limitations for abuse claims

Advocates say getting rid of the statute of limitations for victims of child sexual abuse is a matter of moral justice, but the Archdiocese of Boston says the move will hurt its own efforts to help sexual abuse victims.

The Massachusetts Legislature is considering eliminating the civil statute of limitations for adult victims of child sexual abuse. The current law allows victims to file civil lawsuits up to 35 years after the abuse.

The state lawmaker behind the effort, Democratic Sen. Joan Lovely of Salem, said victims still need more time to reckon with the trauma they suffered as children.

Lovely, who says she is a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, told WGBH’s « Greater Boston » news show that many victims are unable to come forward until well into adulthood.

« We want to make sure people have the opportunity to bring action when they are ready to do so, » Lovely told WGBH.

Lovely did not respond to OSV News’ requests for comment.

Terrence Donilon, secretary for communications and public affairs for the Boston Archdiocese, which is led by Cardinal Seán P. O’Malley, provided a statement from the archdiocese opposing Lovely’s bill. According to the statement, removing the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits would put at risk the archdiocesan aid program for sexual abuse victims.

« The legislative changes currently proposed and under consideration would jeopardize our ability to continue to (assist victims) and would make it difficult to sustain the many works of mercy the church is committed to through social justice and support for the neediest, » the statement said.

But Mitchell Garabedian, an attorney for numerous clergy sexual abuse victims, including some in Boston, said lifting the statute of limitations is imperative.

« Not passing such legislation sends a message to the victims that he or she does not matter, and also allows the sexual abuser, negligent supervisor and entities to escape accountability, » Garabedian said.

David Vicinanzo, a New England attorney who has represented both sexual abuse victims and Catholic institutions throughout his career, called completely lifting the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse victims « almost an incontrovertible good policy. »

« From a moral perspective it’s not a close call, it’s the right thing to do, » Vicinanzo said.

A former federal prosecutor as well as a practicing Catholic, Vicinanzo represented neighboring New Hampshire’s Catholic Church in the 2000s after the Boston sexual abuse scandal broke. He helped the Manchester Diocese set up its settlement system to make it easy for victims to seek damages. Currently, he is one of the lead attorneys for more than 1,200 victims suing the state of New Hampshire after they were abused as children while detained in the Sununu Youth Development Center.

Vicinanzo has seen adult victims come forward after living with their abuse for decades, and many state legislatures have or are now considering removing their state’s limits.

« It’s something that legislatures are becoming enlightened to, the fact that childhood abuse often takes many years to recognize or even report because of the unique traumatic effects it has on a juvenile brain, » Vicinanzo said.

Statute of limitation laws can stop victims from being able to seek some form of justice when they are finally ready to come forward. In cases where the alleged abuser is dead and cannot be criminally charged, it is the only justice for which these victims can hope, he said.

Making it easier for victims to seek justice also creates accountability for large institutions, like the church or a state government. Such accountability and scrutiny means abusers will be named and the public protected, Vicinanzo said.

« If you don’t make it easy for people to report abuse, it allows the abusers to continue. Until people report it, until people know about it, it continues to happen and more kids get harmed, » Vicinanzo said.

O’Malley is the Vatican’s point man on dealing with clergy sex abuse. He was appointed president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors in 2014. O’Malley also is a member of the international Council of Cardinals, the body instituted by Pope Francis to assist in governing the Catholic Church and institute reforms to the Vatican bureaucracy.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Clergy abuse survivors propose new ‘zero tolerance’ law following outcry over Vatican appointment

Clergy sexual abuse survivors on  unveiled a proposed new church law calling for the permanent removal of abusive priests and superiors who covered for them, as they stepped up their outrage over Pope Francis’ choice to head the Vatican office that investigates sex crimes.

The global advocacy group End Clergy Abuse unveiled the draft law at a press conference following days of protests around the Vatican, and before taking their complaints to the U.N. in Geneva. They are seeking to draw attention to the ongoing scandal in the Catholic Church and the failure of Francis and the hierarchy to make good on years of pledges of « zero tolerance » for abuse.

Specifically, the survivors have expressed astonishment at Francis’ nomination of an old friend and theologian, Cardinal Victor Fernández, to take over as prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, given Fernández’s record handling cases as bishop in his native Argentina.

When Fernández was bishop of La Plata, Argentina, he refused to promptly remove one of his priests, Eduardo Lorenzo, who was repeatedly accused of abusing teens. Ten years after a victim first came forward, and hours after learning that an Argentine judge had ordered his arrest, Lorenzo was found dead in 2019 in what was ruled a suicide. Fernández had stood by Lorenzo and officiated at his funeral.

The Vatican office that Fernández now heads has processed priest abuse cases globally since 2001, meting out church punishments that are never more severe than being defrocked, or « reduced » back to being a layman. After bullish years under the late Pope Benedict XVI, who defrocked nearly 850 priests in a decade, the office in recent years appears to have taken a more lenient approach as cases poured in from around the globe.

Francis himself had a big learning curve on abuse, arriving at the Vatican in 2013 claiming to have never handled a case and then botching a big scandal in Chile in 2018. He did an about-face, vowed « zero tolerance » for abuse and marshalled through a new church law holding bishops accountable when they cover up cases.

But recently, the momentum appears to have waned, transparency has remained elusive and victims have sensed a backsliding — perhaps none more so than in Francis’ nomination of Fernández to head the Vatican’s sex abuse office.

« We easily went back 10 years on this issue this week, » said Peter Isely, a founding member of both End Clergy Abuse (ECA) now and its U.S. partner organization, SNAP.

One of Lorenzo’s victims, Diego Perez, was in Rome this week and said he couldn’t believe Fernández was now in charge of the office that processes abuse cases globally.

« Surely he shouldn’t be in this position, » Perez told reporters.

Fernández acknowledged in an interview with The Associated Press earlier this year that he made mistakes in the Lorenzo case, saying he should have removed him from ministry earlier and treated his victims better. He blamed his own inexperience and what he said were unclear church procedures.

The online resource BishopAccountability.org has documented two other cases that it said showed Fernández stood by his priests rather than their alleged victims.

Francis made Fernández a cardinal on Sept. 30, after telling him in his letter of appointment that he wouldn’t have to handle abuse cases personally in his new Vatican job. Francis said the office’s small discipline section, headed by an Irish priest, would handle the dossier, even though the scale of the problem has long cried out for authoritative, high-ranking leadership in a hierarchy still resistant to removing abusers.

The proposed new church law that ECA unveiled on Oct. 2 calls for any priest who commits a sexual offense against a minor or « vulnerable adult » to be dismissed from the clerical state. Any bishop or religious superior who fails to report sex crimes to law enforcement would also be removed.

Janet Aguti, an ECA member from Uganda, said the cover-up of clergy abuse cases in Africa is even worse than elsewhere because of the stigma of sexual crimes and the exalted status that priests have in African communities. That makes it hard for victims to come forward, much less find justice from the state or church authorities, who typically respond by moving abusers to new dioceses, she said.

« They (priests) have helped us to build schools, they have helped us to build hospitals. And you don’t want to be the first to come out and point fingers at them because then the community is going to turn against you, » she said.

Organizers said they have tried in various ways to get the text of the proposed « zero tolerance » law into Francis’ hands, including via a high-profile cardinal helping to run the Vatican’s big meeting of bishops this month, Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich.

Hollerich told organizers he’d give Francis a copy in December.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Before synod retreat, pope prays for listening instead of polarization

On the eve of a three-day spiritual retreat for participants in the assembly of the Synod of Bishops, Pope Francis prayed that members of the church may embrace silence to listen to the voice of God and one another.

« Silence, in the ecclesial community, makes fraternal communication possible, where the Holy Spirit draws together points of view, » the pope said to members of the synod, Christian leaders and young people in St. Peter’s Square Sept. 30. « To be synodal is to welcome one another like this, in the knowledge that we all have something to share and to learn, gathering together to listen to the spirit of truth in order to know what the Lord is saying to the churches. »

Synod participants were scheduled to spend three days together at a spiritual retreat outside Rome before the synod assembly formally opens Oct. 4.

Seated before the San Damiano cross, in front of which St. Francis of Assisi said he heard Jesus tell him to « rebuild my church, » Pope Francis prayed that « the synod be a ‘kairos’ (moment) of fraternity, a place where the Holy Spirit will purify the church from gossip, ideologies and polarization. »

Alongside Pope Francis were the leaders of 12 Christian churches and communities, including Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, Anglican Archbishop Justin Welby of Canterbury, Syriac Orthodox Patriarch Ignatius Aphrem II and the Rev. Anne Burghardt, general secretary of the Lutheran World Federation. Some 4,700 young people from 51 countries and belonging to different Christian traditions also were present in the square, according the ecumenical Taizé Community which organized the event. The Vatican said some 18,000 in total were present.

Many of the young participants in the prayer vigil completed a pilgrimage through Rome, walking to St. Peter’s Square after a time of praise and worship at the Basilica of St. John Lateran, the cathedral of the Diocese of Rome, on the other side of the city.

Pope Francis told the group that just as silence is necessary to listen to the different perspectives that exist within the Catholic Church, « silence is essential for the journey of Christian unity. »

Silence « is fundamental to prayer, and ecumenism begins with prayer and is sterile without it, » he said. « The more we turn together to the Lord in prayer, the more we feel that it is he who purifies us and unites us beyond our differences. »

To put the vigil’s message into action, eight minutes of silence was observed in the ornate square which was decorated with Dutch flowers. Earlier in the day, Pope Francis had created 21 new cardinals at a consistory in the square.

The pope noted that the silence that fell upon the square was « not an empty silence, but a moment filled with faith, expectation and readiness. »

« In a world full of noise, we are no longer accustomed to silence; indeed sometimes we struggle with it, because silence forces us to face God and ourselves, » he said. « Yet it lies at the foundation of the word and of life. » 

Before the vigil, young people from Lebanon, Indonesia and Slovenia shared their experiences of participating in the Catholic Church’s synodal journey. Tilen from Slovenia shared that he was struck by how a single question could start an « all-night series of listening, disagreeing, growing, and seeing how taking the time to listen to each other helped us to go deeper. »

Ukrainian children dressed in traditional outfits and Nigerian musicians performed before for the vigil, which was accompanied by music from the Taizé Community.

Joined at the center of the stage by the other church leaders, Pope Francis closed the prayer vigil by praying that the Holy Spirit would fill the synod participants with « wisdom and courage in order to be servants of communion and bold witnesses of your forgiveness in today’s world. »