Catégories
Vie de l'église

At the height of their literary…

The social media landscape doesn’t lend itself well to the practice of humility. At the height of its influence in the 20th century, the legacy press landscape also traded in the inflation of egos. Yet Catholic authors sometimes said or did things that pierced that bubble of ego — and often in jarring ways. At the height of their literary success, authors like Evelyn Waugh, Muriel Spark, Graham Greene and Flannery O’Connor reflected on themselves as sinners in need of grace.

Evelyn Waugh

Waugh’s first marriage collapsed in 1929. This crisis left its mark on his satirical 1930 novel Vile Bodies, which he wrote as his own life unraveled. A year after his divorce, he was received into the Catholic Church. His conversion was an unsentimental affair. In Waugh’s estimation, the Catholic Church held the fullness of the truth, therefore it was reasonable to revere it — and that was that.

When Waugh (1903-1966) appeared in a 1960 BBC television interview, he told reporter John Freeman that in the late 1920s he was « as near an atheist as one could be. » Freeman asked Waugh to speak of the greatest gift he’d received from Catholicism. Was it tranquility or perhaps peace of mind? « It isn’t a lucky dip that you get something out of, » Waugh responded. « It’s simply admitting the existence of God or dependence on God or contact with God — the fact that everything good in the world depends on him. It isn’t a sort of added amenity of the welfare state that you say, ‘Well, to all this, having made a good income, now I’ll have a little icing on top of religion.’ It’s the essence of the whole thing. »

Waugh’s temperament was sometimes as extraordinary as his writing. He was often a cruel curmudgeon, a prickly snob; he dabbled in fascistic politics and he was mercurial. If there’s truth to the trope of upper-class British fathers preferring their pet dogs over their children, Waugh took pains to embody that truth. He wasn’t much better with adults. When novelist and friend Nancy Mitford introduced Waugh to her publisher in 1950, Waugh shocked them with his rude behavior. « How can you behave so badly — and you a Catholic, » Mitford exclaimed. « You have no idea how much nastier I would be if I was not a Catholic, » Waugh responded. « Without supernatural aid I would hardly be a human being. »

Waugh is funny in both his literature and his letters. In his fiction, humor serves to make the harsh truths of a fallen world more bearable. There’s also humor in how he recognizes his own fallen nature. That humor, however, doesn’t dull the knife that cuts away at everything that veils sin. In his 1934 novel A Handful of Dust, that veil is made of fame, privilege, power, class and socialite culture. Waugh tears the veil away in a scene that can’t be forgotten. A mother who pursues a romantic affair with an awful man called John — who bears the same name as her young son — receives news that « John » had suffered a terrible accident. As it slowly dawns on her that the victim is her little boy and not her lover, her initial reaction is to thank God in relief — before bursting into tears. The horrible scene is compelling because it’s so authentically human.

Muriel Spark

Muriel Spark (1918-2006), a generation younger than Waugh, enjoyed his support. Spark’s conversion to Catholicism in 1954 made her sympathetic, as did the fact that her own writings were also funny, cruel and engaged with faith. Her 1959 novel Memento Mori explores a community of elderly Londoners subject to cryptic phone calls. A man rings to remind them that they must die. The anonymous caller is politely stating a fact of life. Most of the victims react with indignation or paranoia. A retired penal reform activist demands that the culprit be found and flogged.

Only one character takes the call in stride. Charmian Piper is Catholic and senile. She enjoys a moment of visionary clarity when she receives the call. She tells the caller that reflecting on her death is an exercise she’s done for decades. Here’s a memorable fictional character who, in a world where self-importance and personal survival dominate, attributes less import to her earthly existence.

Spark’s father was Jewish, her mother was Anglican and she attended a Presbyterian school. Like Waugh, her conversion to Catholicism wasn’t emotional. She began reading the works of Cardinal John Henry Newman and, as she shared in a television interview, she « just drifted into » Catholicism.

« Largely I’m still a Catholic, because I can’t believe in anything else, » she said. « I’d often like to, but I can’t.” The interviewer asked her if she was satisfied with her religion. « No, » she said, smiling. « Perhaps the truth isn’t satisfying. » Spark certainly wasn’t satisfied with the church’s views on birth control — which she supported staunchly. Spark speaks of subjecting her will to examination in light of a truth that is greater than herself — even when it’s unsatisfying to do so and even if it doesn’t transform her views.

Graham Greene

In the vanguard of British authors who converted to Catholicism also stood Greene (1904-1991), the author of The Power and the Glory. In 1953, Greene got himself chastised in a pastoral letter from the Holy Office, the predecessor of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. He was admonished for engaging in « odd and paradoxical » writing and for « troubling the spirit of calm that should prevail in a Christian. »

In that sense, he wasn’t any different from Waugh, Spark or — across the Atlantic — Flannery O’Connor. Greene’s protagonist was a nameless, indigent priest seeking to escape persecution and death during anti-Catholic purges in Mexico. It takes special skill to create such a memorable character without even giving him a name. The priest was a drinker, he had broken the vow of celibacy and struggled to forgive his enemies. Yet moral failure was the vehicle through which he traveled toward humility and grace.

The protagonist reflects on his life as a young priest: « What an unbearable creature he must have been in those days — and yet in those days he had been comparatively innocent … Then, in his innocence, he had felt no love for anyone: now in his corruption he had learnt.”

Every author, to varying degrees, writes fiction based on personal experience. When creating the « whisky priest » of The Power and the Glory, Greene was no exception. Greene was a thoughtful and tortured Catholic, a serial and selfish adulterer engaged in colorful sexual escapades, eventually a Catholic agnostic who avoided Communion for three decades and a man dealing with mental illness. Few authors struggled to map out and comprehend grace as persistently as he did.

Flannery O’Connor

O’Connor (1925-1964) was among the few. Burdened by a debilitating illness, tending to peacocks on her family farm and writing for diocesan publications, O’Connor embraced what is sometimes called a « mean grace. » She did, after all, publish a short story, « A Good Man is Hard to Find, » in which a grandmother and her entire family are brutally massacred by escaped convicts. The grandmother, a hypocrite, talks the Christian talk, but only embraces a Christ-like love for the man about to kill her in the moment before she is murdered. « She would have been a good woman…if it had been someone there to shoot her every minute of her life » — some of the most haunting words in the literary canon.

But it’s another character, Ruby Turpin from « Revelation, » a story written months before O’Connor’s death, where the author’s search for grace is most striking. Mrs. Turpin, a self-satisfied middle-class bigot of the highest order, faces the vision of a God who makes the poor and the scorned become the first and the « decent » ones of the middle class the last. Mrs. Turpin embodied the racist and classist impulses of the American south in the decades of racial segregation — impulses that ran deep and far.

O’Connor must have come across many Mrs. Turpins in her day. And to what degree did she see herself reflected in the character she had created — fallen and facing grace that was hard to bear? On May 20, 1964, in her last weeks of life, she wrote to her friend and playwright Maryat Lee about checking into Piedmont Hospital in Atlanta for transfusions and treatment. On the threshold of death, she signed one of her last letters as « Mrs. Turpin. »

These 20th century Catholic authors often wrote with striking cruelty, but also with bravery. They took a scalpel to the satiny fabrics of society, while never forgetting that they were part of that society, too.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

« C.S. Lewis on Stage: Further Up &…

Stars and planets swoop across a black backdrop, the stars gradually spinning into the faint shape of an enormous eye. A middle-aged C.S. Lewis, played by award-winning actor Max McLean, sits in his comfortable study. A bottle of Port wine rests on a buffet table. A small model of a lion perches on a stack of books. Lewis greets the audience, then dives straight into pondering the origins of the universe.

So opens McLean’s latest play about the beloved Christian apologist, « C.S. Lewis on Stage: Further Up & Further In. » The 90-minute, one-man play was written and performed by McLean and produced by Fellowship for Performing Arts, or FPA, a New York City production company that creates drama from a Christian worldview. McLean, who has already adapted several of Lewis’ works for the stage, is FPA’s founder and artistic director. « Further Up & Further In » debuted in Dallas in October and will appear in cities across the U.S. through April 2023.

There are two possible explanations for the universe, Lewis tells the audience. The materialist explanation, which says matter is all that exists and can account for everything that happens, and the religious explanation, which says the universe was created by a being outside the material world. Lewis staunchly favors the latter. But as a former atheist, he takes the possibility of materialism seriously.

Those familiar with Lewis’ work will recognize this opening monologue from the pages of Mere Christianity, Lewis’ best-selling book based on his radio addresses during World War II. In fact, devotees of Lewis could play a game while watching the play: Who can identify the most references to Lewis’ oeuvre? Even the images splashed across the backdrop are recognizable. Here is the modest kitchen in The Kilns, the Oxford home where Lewis lived with his older brother, Warnie. Here are the grounds of Magdalene College, where Lewis taught medieval and Renaissance literature.

The play is a standalone sequel to McLean’s previous production, « C.S. Lewis on Stage: The Most Reluctant Convert, » which recounts Lewis’ conversion to Christianity. « The Most Reluctant Convert » was so well received as a play, McLean turned it into a movie released in 2021. The movie is available to watch on Amazon, Apple TV and other streaming services.

« Further Up & Further In » picks up where « The Most Reluctant Convert » ended. The play aims to tell the story of how Lewis went from a respected but little-known scholar at Oxford University to one of the most beloved Christian thinkers of the 20th century. If that storyline is a bit thin, the play more than makes up for it by the uncanny performance of McLean as Lewis and the absolute delight of hearing Lewis’ words performed onstage.

« Further Up & Further In » is less an origin story and more a drama of ideas. And no wonder, since in writing the play, McLean drew directly from Lewis’ work, including bestsellers like The Problem of Pain, Mere Christianity and God in the Dock. At one point Lewis looks up from his desk to tell the audience what has become a famous quote: « Pain is God’s megaphone to rouse a deaf world. » At another point, he articulates the popular liar, lunatic or Lord argument. And in a particularly tender scene, Lewis recounts a passage about Jill and Aslan from The Chronicles of Narnia (Lewis says he doesn’t think the Narnia books will amount to much, and the audience laughs).

Lewis relates how the popularity of The Problem of Pain, his slim book about evil as an objection to the existence of a benevolent God, led to his invitation to speak about Christianity on the BBC during World War II in a series of addresses unoriginally titled « Broadcast Talks » (the title gets another laugh — despite the seriousness of Lewis’ work, the play is not without his quintessential humor). To listen to a recording of an original Broadcast Talk is to realize how exceptional McLean’s performance really is. McLean embodies Lewis, from the lulling accent down to the three-piece suit.

Much of the play centers around Lewis’ correspondence with an earnest skeptic who admires Lewis’ work but can’t quite share his belief in God, let alone Jesus. Lewis tenderly reads each of the skeptic’s letters out loud. If real, why wouldn’t God’s existence be clearer, asks the skeptic? The same kinds of questions might rattle around the minds of some in the audience. When Lewis answers in his thoughtful, logical way, it’s as if we too are in his Oxford study discussing the origins of the universe over a glass of fine Port.

But Lewis does not merely respond to the skeptic with rational arguments. He shows us all what it’s like to embark on the journey of faith — a journey of challenge and joy that asymptotically approaches God. This journey is as much about our choosing God as God choosing us, says Lewis. And it often begins with a longing for something that cannot be found this side of heaven.

This desire is like « the scent of a flower we have not found » and « the echo of a tune we have not heard, » says Lewis in a line straight from The Weight of Glory. That flower, that tune — that heavenly realm — is more wonderful than all the stars in all the galaxies that spin behind Lewis’s head. It’s waiting for us if we, like Lewis, are willing to journey further up and further in. That’s the real challenge, the invitation, of McLean’s play.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Xavier University of Louisiana,…

Xavier University of Louisiana, which for decades has placed the most African American graduates into medical schools across the country each year, will open a College of Medicine in a partnership with Ochsner Health, executives of Xavier and Ochsner announced Jan. 17.

The new medical school, expected to open within four to five years, has as its primary goals building a pipeline of African American doctors for a health-care field in which people of color are underrepresented and extending the founding mission of St. Katharine Drexel « to promote a more just and humane society, » said Xavier President Reynold Verret.

« Our work with Ochsner and other partners who hold close to their hearts a vision of healing a broken world is a testament to Xavier’s mission, » Verret said, recalling how St. Katharine and the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament educated teachers more than 100 years ago to branch out and teach in African American and Native American communities.

St. Katharine established Xavier University of Louisiana in 1925. It is today the U.S.’s only Catholic HBCU (historically Black colleges and universities founded before the 1964 Civil Rights Act).

« It’s very exciting because we are basically moving in what we are expected to do in being of service, » Verret said. « We have been evaluating how we should be of service and what we should do. Our dedication to preparing more Black health care professionals in our fight against health inequity is our answer to the call of our nation’s critical need and makes (the sisters’) legacy proud. »

Dr. Leonardo Seoane, executive vice president and chief academic officer of Ochsner Health, said the partnership with Xavier extends an excellent working relationship between the two. The first cohort of 37 Xavier students graduated in 2022 from a new Xavier-Ochsner Physician Assistant Program.

« The Physician Assistant Program has gone great and really speaks to the trust and the bond between Ochsner and Xavier, » Seoane said. « We graduated our first class last year, and we at Ochsner hired 17 of those 37 graduates, so it’s fulfilling its mission. »

Xavier has produced more African American students who go on to earn medical degrees and doctorates in the health sciences than any other college or university in the country.

According to a Human Resources for Health analysis, African Americans comprise about 5% of the nation’s physicians while accounting for 13% of the U.S. population. Hispanic Americans comprise 6% of the country’s physicians while accounting for 19% of the population.

« Xavier has the distinction of putting more African Americans into medical school that go on to finish medical school than any other university in the United States, » Seoane said. « They have held that distinction for many years, and it’s not a big university. People connote Xavier with excellence in science, technology and math degrees, and they have lived their mission to promote justice and promote diversity, especially in the sciences. It is truly a privilege to work with Xavier.

« You take Ochsner as a premier academic medical center and you take Xavier with its excellence in STEM education and its reputation for living their mission and you put that together, and it really will address a crisis, » he said.

Seoane anticipates the medical school opening within four to five years with an estimated first-year enrollment of 50 students. He said the College of Medicine needs to receive accreditation from both the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools and from the Liaison Committee of Medical Education.

« Our timeline is four to five years to take in the first students in the freshman class, » Seoane said. « If you look at all the new medical schools that have started in the U.S., they all seem to start at around 50 students. »

When it opens, the Xavier College of Medicine will be the fourth medical school in Louisiana. The others are the LSU Schools of Medicine in New Orleans and Shreveport, and Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans.

« Remember, the next step after medical school is residency and then potentially a fellowship, depending on if you want to specialize, » Seoane said. « We have 31 accredited residencies and fellowships already at Ochsner, and we’re building new ones. For Ochsner and the community, it’s a huge win. With our partnership with Xavier and its new College of Medicine, we’ll have medical students who will feed into our residency and fellowship programs.

« If you look at the statistics, we talk a lot about the 70% rule — which says that 70% of doctors practice medicine within 70 miles of where they did their last residency or fellowship. So, this absolutely will equate to more doctors in Louisiana. »

By 2034, Seoane said there is expected to be a shortage of about 64,000 physicians in the U.S., « but, of course, that is worse in the South and in rural areas. »

Verret said talks are underway about the location of a new facility for the medical school.

« There probably will be a need for building a space where the medical school will be, » Verret said. « It is our joint expectation that we will do something in the city of New Orleans. We have some physical space on campus that we will be looking at, but right now the plans are not set. »Verret said the announcement was the culmination of many years of dreams and evaluation by the university’s board of directors.

« There’s been a lot of positive encouragement, » he said. « Really what (students, faculty and alumni) have told us is that if you can do this well, it should be done. We have a mission of service, which goes back to our beginnings. What are we called to do to be of service and to be relevant for the future and for our community, both here and nationwide. The mission has never changed — to contribute to a more just and humane society. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Francis, the comic strip: The pope…

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The Vatican has ordered a…

The Vatican has ordered a prominent French priest who advised the Holy See for years on matters of sex and homosexuality to cease his psychotherapy practice following allegations he sexually abused men in his therapeutic care.

But the Vatican didn’t defrock or otherwise sanction the Fr. Tony Anatrella despite several well-documented complaints against him, in further evidence of the Holy See’s reluctance to punish priests who abuse adults with the harshest measures, especially when the crimes occurred a long time ago.

French and Catholic media over the years have reported claims by several men and seminarians who were sent to Anatrella because they exhibited homosexual tendencies, only to then be allegedly subjected to sexualized therapy with him. Anatrella had been considered one of the Catholic Church’s foremost experts on homosexuality, and had served as a consulting member of the Vatican’s family and health offices.

Church teaching considers homosexual acts to be “intrinsically disordered” and the Vatican in 2005 issued a policy aimed at keeping men with “deep-seated” homosexual tendencies from becoming priests.

In a statement Jan. 17, the Paris archdiocese noted that the French justice system hadn’t prosecuted Anatrella criminally because the allegations against him exceeded the statute of limitations.

The statement said the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which handles abuse cases, issued one measure against Anatrella after a church trial initiated in 2016, to “immediately renounce all professional activities as a therapist.”

Additionally, the Parish archdiocese “formally asked” Anatrella, the author of over a dozen books on gender studies, marriage and family life, to cease all publications, public ministry and participation in conferences. It forbade him from hearing confession and asked him to lead a reserved life of prayer.

The request, however, was merely a “warning” “under the penalty of canonical sanctions,” suggesting even the archdiocese was unwilling or unable to impose harsher penalties on him. The newspaper of the Italian bishops conference, Avvenire, had reported in 2018 that Anatrella’s church lawyers had argued that he committed no canonical crime.

The Vatican has articulated norms for sanctioning priests who sexually abuse minors, up to and including laicizing them, or removing them from the priesthood. And the Vatican regularly waives the statute of limitations for cases involving abuse of minors. But the Holy See’s in-house legal code has only recently begun to recognize abuses against adults, and the abuses of authority and spiritual abuses that often accompany such crimes.

Recently, another case has grabbed headlines involving a prominent Jesuit priest and artist, Fr. Marko Ivan Rupnik, who was accused by nine women of spiritual and sexual abuses dating from the 1990s when he helped run a religious community in Slovenia.

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith refused to waive the statute of limitations in the case, even after declaring a year earlier that Rupnik had been excommunicated for having committed one of the gravest crimes in the church, using the confessional to absolve a woman with whom he had engaged in sexual activities.

The Jesuits say Rupnik, whose mosaics decorate churches and basilicas around the globe, remains under restricted ministry.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

The call to faith in Jesus always…

The call to faith in Jesus always is a call to service and mission, Pope Francis told seminarians, priests and staff of the Pontifical North American College.

« Whenever Jesus calls men and women, he always does so in order to send them out, in particular to the vulnerable and those on the margins of society, whom we are not only called to serve but from whom we can also learn much, » the pope said Jan. 14.

The college, a seminary in Rome sponsored by the bishops of the United States, has 116 students from 55 dioceses.

Msgr. Thomas W. Powers, rector of the college, told Francis: « The generous young men you see in front of you want to be like Jesus, the good shepherd. They know the Lord will use their eyes to seek out the suffering; their mouths to preach his Word, console the afflicted and make him present in the Eucharist; their hands to give strength to the sick and the dying and to heal those oppressed by sin; and their feet to go to the peripheries to lead the lost sheep home. »

Francis noted that the students’ years in Rome coincide with « the synodal journey that the whole church is presently undertaking, a journey that involves listening — to the Holy Spirit and to one another — in order to discern how to help God’s holy people live his gift of communion and become missionary disciples. »

The same « challenge and task » is entrusted to those preparing for ordination, he said. « People nowadays need us to listen to their questions, anxieties and dreams so that we can better lead them to the Lord, who rekindles hope and renews the life of all. »

Francis used the Gospel story of the call of Andrew and Simon Peter to illustrate what he said are three elements « essential to priestly formation: dialogue, communion and mission. »

When Jesus noticed Andrew and another following him, he asked what they were seeking and invited them to come and see where he was staying.

« Over the course of your lives, and especially throughout this time of seminary formation, » the pope told the seminarians, « the Lord enters into a personal dialogue with you, asking what you are looking for and inviting you to ‘come and see,’ to speak with him from your hearts and give yourselves to him confidently in faith and love. »

Daily prayer, Scripture meditation and praying « in silence before the tabernacle » are essential for building a personal relationship with the Lord, learning to hear his voice and discovering « how to serve him and his people generously and wholeheartedly, » the pope said.

« By staying with Jesus, the disciples began to learn — from his words, gestures and even his gaze — what really mattered to him and what his Father had sent him to proclaim, » he said. « In a similar way, the journey of priestly formation demands a constant communion: first with God, but also with those joined together in Christ’s body, the church. »

The pope asked the seminarians to « keep your eyes open both to the mystery of the church’s unity, manifested in legitimate diversity yet lived in the oneness of faith, and to the prophetic witness of charity that the church, particularly here in Rome, expresses through her concrete acts of care for those in need. »

Witnessing and participating in that service, he said, « will help you develop that fraternal love capable of seeing the grandeur of our neighbor, of finding God in every human being, of tolerating the nuisances of life in common. »

Francis prayed that the students « will always be signs of a church that goes forth, sharing the presence, compassion and love of Jesus with our brothers and sisters. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Pencil Preaching for Monday,…

“New wine, new wineskins” (Mark 2:22).

National Holiday for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Heb 5:1-10; Mk 2:18-22

In today’s short gospel from Mark, Jesus is questioned for not observing the regular fasting laws that the Pharisees and the followers of John the Baptist are observing. Jesus compares his presence to a wedding, when fasting is dispensed from so people can celebrate, eat, drink, sing and dance, often for several days.  

Jesus is cause for feasting because heaven has come to earth in him. The Incarnation is the nuptial between God and his people, divinity and humanity. The Spirit of God is hovering over the world as at creation, the moment of conception when we came to be in God’s image.  Because of Jesus, a renewal of creation is happening. Those who accept him experience a kind of conception that will lead to their rebirth as children of God. 

He uses two little parables to respond to his critics.  They are like someone patching an old cloak with new, unshrunken cloth. As the patch shrinks, it tears away from the rest of the garment. Or they are like someone who pours new wine, still fermenting and expanding, into an old wineskin, which can no longer stretch, so it bursts, and the wine is lost.  

The imagery is about the demand that newness places on the old. New ideas, hopes and dreams stretch tradition. New energy needs room to grow. Institutions that cannot adapt to change falter. Jesus is proclaiming a new way of understanding God that will liberate the community to new life. New wine requires fresh wineskins. 

Two thousand years ago, Jesus was executed to try and stop the revolution of the heart and the transformation of history he proclaimed. But the wedding could not be stopped by violence, and it was revealed at Easter as universal and unstoppable. 

More than 60 years ago, the Civil Rights Movement was the new wine challenging long-standing institutional racism. A champion of change, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., was assassinated in 1968 to stop another wedding of justice and peace, still far from consummated but now written into the fabric of American identity. There can be no going back.  

The promise of the Gospel is the energy built into the signs of the times. We feast on this promise in hope, even as we fast and struggle toward the day when it is accomplished. 

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Franciscan Fr. Dan Riley points…

Franciscan Fr. Dan Riley felt called to write a book on the « longing to listen and learn from God within God’s world, to come to know who I am before God, and to come to know who we are as God’s people. » In Franciscan Lectio, he succeeded in putting such personal pen to paper. The question is, will it impact the reader as much as its author?

Encouraged to write by Franciscan Murray Bodo and Bruno Barnhart of New Camadoli Hermitage in Big Sur, and aided by collaborator Stephen Copeland, Riley’s self-proclaimed be « talkative » nature is reflected in the text, which is chock-full of personal stories and experiences as he shares his Franciscan take on lectio divina.

Lectio divina (divine reading) is a form of contemplative prayer that dates to the third century. Riley describes it as « a practice that arose out of the desert from people determined to become more grounded in the radicalness and richness of gospel living. »

The book is divided into four sections, based on words written in a letter from St. Clare to Agnes of Prague. Clare recommends to Agnes a style of prayer in which she should gaze upon Christ, examine, contemplate and follow his example. Thus, Riley’s section titles: Gaze, Consider, Contemplate and Imitate. The first of these takes up the majority of the pages.

Riley and Copeland have a bit of difficulty deciding on the aim of this book. Riley’s personal reminiscences are blended with quotes from a broad range of sources — St. Bonaventure, St. Clare, Robert Lax, Rainer Maria Rilke, Richard Rohr, Thich Nhat Hahn and others. He includes only one Benedictine-related source — Thomas Merton — which struck me as both unfortunate and an odd choice, considering the intimate connection between the Benedictine tradition and the practice of lectio divina.

As someone who has studied both Franciscan and Benedictine spirituality for decades, I found the absence of Benedictine sources in Riley’s chapters intentional. He credits the desert fathers and mothers with originating lectio divina, but from there mentions little of how this rich practice continues, even today, within countless monastic communities. He claims, « Lectio Divina is a significant and rediscovered practice. » It was, however, never lost.

The author allows that much of the text may seem to go in circles and, as such, will need to be revisited by the reader. But I found the structure less akin to circles than to erratic tangents that made the work hard to follow — and in mixing pronouns, asking questions of the reader along the way, and then providing his own answers, Riley further muddles his message.

This is not to undermine the validity of many of Riley’s points. He rightly asserts, « Lectio helps us to practice our coming into unity with our diversity, complexity, feeling, and thinking. » He points out how God is immediate and, « Lectio begins when we create a place within ourselves for an encounter. » I found such observations deeply nourishing.

Riley is steeped in the Franciscan tradition, having lived nearly 40 years at Mt. Irenaeus. He travels with other friars and students from nearby St. Bonaventure University, sharing the spirituality learned in his community in the Allegheny Mountains of western New York in the « marketplace » — as Franciscans have done for eight centuries.

« Our Franciscan tradition helps us open our eyes to the undervalued wholeness of being a human person and the wholeness of all creation, » he writes. There is an earnest attempt to integrate this concept into the practice of lectio divina; even an offering of « recipes » in an addendum following the main text.

Riley advocates for variations like « sidewalk lectio, » lectio of the Mountain, the lectio of St. Clare and others. He lists the four Ss of lectio: solitude, silence, simplicity, service; and the four Ws: watch, wonder, wait, work.

Lectio, Riley says, is « a full meal, » which is a delightful description. But then he confuses matters by adding, « Lectio is not random but is rich in spontaneity and depth as the spirit of God surprises us so that we also surprise one another when we ‘cook Lectio.’  » Riley creates more of a seven-course gourmet repast, where the readers may find themselves overstuffed and bewildered from the effects of the different wines served with each dish.

For those interested in learning more about Riley and Franciscan beliefs, this book is worthwhile. Those hoping to learn about lectio divina may find more of what they seek elsewhere. Perhaps, when creating this work, Riley should have taken his own words — and one of the staples of Franciscan spirituality — to heart: « One of the geniuses of Lectio is its simplicity. »

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Scripture for Life: As we begin…

Have you ever glimpsed pure goodness in another person? Sometimes we see it as we gaze on a baby — goodness, innocence and seemingly limitless potential. On rarer occasions, we get caught up in a similar perception of a young person or an adult. Some people seem to exude peace and integrity. They are a blessing to be around. That must be what John the Baptist perceived in Jesus: a person whose very being illustrated holiness.

Who was John that he could recognize Jesus for who he was? According to Luke, John was a new Isaac, a son of the promise born to an aged couple. Today’s liturgy suggests that he identified with the servant Isaiah described: called from the time of his conception to be a light to his people. All the Gospels depict John as a conscious forerunner to the Christ. Never claiming to be a messiah, he preached to prepare the way, probably never guessing how different Jesus’ preaching would be from his own.

Surprisingly, the Baptist’s essential characteristic, at least as he appears in the Gospel of John, is his humility. The rousing prophet, the desert ascetic who invented the baptismal ritual that continues to our own day, proclaimed that the unknown one to come after him ranked ahead of him. Although John’s Gospel avoids admitting that Jesus submitted to baptism, the Baptist testifies that he saw the Spirit come down upon Jesus at the moment the other Gospels describe as the baptism.

Although he was not a disciple, John gets a more detailed and personal description than the Gospels give any other character except Jesus himself. Historically, John was probably as well known as Jesus and his following rivaled that of Jesus. But, with all that John accomplished, his greatest Gospel witness came through his saying that he was not “the one.” The picture we get of John is that he not only had enough faith to believe in his own unique and crucial vocation, but enough to see beyond his own call, talents and insights.

If there were one phrase that could sum up John’s essential message, it might be our Muslim friends’ cry, « Allahu Akbar » (« God is greater »). With all his accomplishments, with everything he saw around him, be it the might of Rome or the uncountable stars in the sky, John lived and breathed an attitude of « Allahu Akbar. »

That is the attitude that allowed John to recognize Jesus. With a profound grasp of his own prophetic vocation, John recognized something greater in Jesus, something that reflected more of God and more of God’s promised future. Thus, John uttered those mystery-filled words we repeat in each Eucharist, « Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. » The grace that impelled John in his vocation led him to recognize the grace that filled Jesus.

What did John mean by calling Jesus, « Lamb of God »? Was he referring to the lamb that replaced Isaac in Abraham’s sacrifice? The lamb of Exodus whose blood saved the people from destruction? The lamb of atonement sacrifice that restored the people’s broken relationship with God? To the apocalyptic lamb whose death brought life? The servant of God who went to death like a lamb to the slaughter?

The simplest answer is, yes. John called Jesus the lamb and the son of God. John saw Jesus and could only say, « Allahu Akbar. »

The Gospels tell us about John so we may learn from him and to see ourselves in him. Like John, we have been called from birth. The mystery of our lives is that we are created in the divine image and called to become images of the divine. That’s what Paul means when he says we have been sanctified and are called to be holy. John could recognize Jesus and say « Allahu Akbar » because he too shared the divine life: like knew like. We too know our moments of crying out « Allahu Akbar » because what we see in others and in creation reminds us of both God’s unfathomable greatness and God’s intimate love — a love that dwells in us as well.

John comes to us today inviting us into his own attitude of humble wonderment. First, listening to Isaiah like he did, we remember that we are created in the divine image and that sharing divine life is the reason for our being. Then, lest we ever settle for less or even just settle, John shows us how to open ourselves to the wonder of the God who is greater than we can imagine.

As we begin « Ordinary Time, » John invites us to learn over and over to recognize Christ for who he is and what he offers. Then we too will cry out « Allahu Akbar » in any and every language we speak.

Catégories
Vie de l'église

Religious institutions were…

Despite a few successes — like the establishment of a loss and damages fund — the latest United Nations international conference on climate change (COP27) fell short by failing to name the main source of our global problem: the burning of fossil fuels.

Globally, greenhouse gas emissions are still rising, and most nations are not on track to reduce their emissions at the necessary pace to avert irreversible climate impacts. New fossil fuel projects are being planned or developed across the globe. Keeping the Paris Agreement objective of 1.5°C maximum planetary warming alive seems like an already lost battle.

Religious institutions were present at the November climate summit in Sharm el-Shiekh, Egypt, to lend their moral influence to climate conversations. But one of their most significant contributions to the cause is more tangible than morality, albeit an avenue of often untapped potential: church finances.

Religions worldwide are incarnated into millions of institutions — churches, temples, congregations, schools, health services and more. These institutions own and manage large plots of land, numerous buildings and significant financial assets. In addition to their spiritual and moral influences, religious institutions’ possessions give them great temporal power.

Over the last six years, hundreds of Catholic institutions have publicly committed to divesting from fossil fuels, and thereby aligned their investment policies with the social teachings of the church on care for our common home. By divesting, Catholic institutions raise a prophetic voice, echoing Pope Francis in his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si’, « We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels — especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas — needs to be progressively replaced without delay. »

Yet, the Catholic world is vast, and there are still many voices missing from divestment announcements, despite the Vatican’s clear guidelines. I suspect there are a few reasons for this, among them disconnection, discomfort, confusion and complexity.

Finance is often seen as a technical issue outside the scope of moral and pastoral issues, therefore finance committees and staff are isolated from the work of their counterparts in ministries of justice, peace and creation care. But as Francis says in Laudato Si’, « Everything is interconnected. » Just as Catholic values should influence investing, finance professionals should share their industry knowledge by translating into comprehensible language what are the options on the table. Finance is a means to many ends, not only a way to earn more money.

Many institutions have become used to steadiness in high return and low risk investments. The complexification and commodification of financial assets hides our responsibility as owners or lenders. Some congregations or institutions rely on wealth accumulated over time to take care of elderly members of their communities or to implement projects they have planned over the years. The diversity of financial vehicles must not prevent from having discussions on why and how the wealth accumulated over time is to serve church missions. This is exactly what Mensuram Bonam, the recent text of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, tells us.

The extent of the changes needed is complex and multifaceted. We need some imagination to prepare for the future — to cut emission by half in less than eight years (what is required by the Paris Agreement) looks more like the rapid conversion to war economies during World War II than the gradual transition into the industrial era two centuries ago. This speedy transition can only succeed with total engagement from all actors and strong stewardship of public authorities. Investing 5% of assets in impact investing isn’t sufficient. Decisions to fully divest from fossil fuels and invest in climate solutions show the way forward. Holding shares in, and thus profiting from, fossil fuels means not taking the Paris Agreement or church teaching seriously.

Fossil fuel-related investments’ market values are overestimated and accumulated money is likely to disappear if it’s invested in fossil fuel-related assets, what Carbon Tracker has dubbed « stranded assets. » Financial predictions have been unable to integrate the extent of the damages climate change will inflict on us. For example, only some insurers realize they cannot insure large infrastructures at risk because of more frequent extreme weather events. As the impacts of climate change worsen, our societies and economies are going to change dramatically. « We don’t need an army of actuaries to tell us that the catastrophic impacts of climate change will be felt beyond the traditional horizons of most actors — imposing a cost on future generations that the current generation has no direct incentive to fix, » said Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England at the time.

This poses challenges for the business model of many Catholic institutions. Those who work in finance departments can no longer manage assets according to prudential rules based on the economy of the past, they must consider the economy needed for the future. We cannot separate questions of finance from political and moral questions. That is why the Laudato Si’ Movement encourages Catholic institutions not only to divest from fossil fuels, but also to endorse a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. Those are two sides of the same coin.

The church has sustained itself over time through prudence, but also through prophetic stances, boldness and a spirit of service. It may be difficult for Catholics to put Laudato Si’ and the social teachings of the church into action. But identifying specific challenges can help us overcome them, and help the Catholic Church to raise a prophetic voice and induce dramatic change through the reorientation of its finances.